1998
DOI: 10.1080/08941929809381106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When amateurs are the experts: Amateur mycologists and wild mushroom politics in the Pacific Northwest, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies suggest ways that indigenous and local knowledge of wildlife, habitats, and landscapes can aid conventional management and/or science (Gasteyer and Flora, 2000;Gilchrist and Robertson, 2000;Jansson and Hammer, 1999;Mallory et al, 2003;McLain et al, 1998;Nabhan, 2000;Olsson and Folke, 2001;Usher, 2000). Programs integrating local and conventional scientific knowledge are now described in the literature, including the obstacles and challenges as well as ways that local knowledge enhanced the research or management practices (Calheiros et al, 2000;Davis and Wagner, 2003;Huntington, 2000;Mackinson, 2001;Pattengill-Semmens and Semmens, 2003;Stevenson, 1996;Usher, 2000).…”
Section: Local Ecological Knowledge In Conventional Science and Researchmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Numerous studies suggest ways that indigenous and local knowledge of wildlife, habitats, and landscapes can aid conventional management and/or science (Gasteyer and Flora, 2000;Gilchrist and Robertson, 2000;Jansson and Hammer, 1999;Mallory et al, 2003;McLain et al, 1998;Nabhan, 2000;Olsson and Folke, 2001;Usher, 2000). Programs integrating local and conventional scientific knowledge are now described in the literature, including the obstacles and challenges as well as ways that local knowledge enhanced the research or management practices (Calheiros et al, 2000;Davis and Wagner, 2003;Huntington, 2000;Mackinson, 2001;Pattengill-Semmens and Semmens, 2003;Stevenson, 1996;Usher, 2000).…”
Section: Local Ecological Knowledge In Conventional Science and Researchmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Anderson (2003: 303), for example, argues that meteorology in the nineteenth century was "a science of elite observatories or a science of seamen and shepherd", the former being associated with observatories, precision instruments and the accumulation of data, the latter with weather lore and prophecy. Amateurs and professionals thus developed new scientific identities and while professionals represented expert knowledge, the "amateurs stood for careful and persistent observing" (Lankford 1981: 22), upholding what would become pervasive distinctions between who can and cannot interpret science (Gieryn 1983;Jasanoff 1987) Amateur weather enthusiasts, societies and meteorological networks are thought to have been pivotal to the shaping of professional, scientific and meteorological endeavour (Naylor 2006;Finnegan 2005) and also in the generation of popular support for investigative meteorological science (McLain et al 1998). With the institutionalisation of the amateur, however, also came a public service role.…”
Section: Amateurs Professionalism and The Meteorological Traditionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…2 According to Stebbins, one of the distinguishing characteristics of the modern amateur is the near universal presence of such publics and the fact that the s/he is not simply self serving. It is the attention given to this aspect of modern amateurism that leads us to adopt Stebbins' work within the broader body of literature on amateur scientists, which tends to focus on their relationships with policy actors and professional scientists Waterton 2004, 2005;Lawrence and Turnhout 2010;McLain et al 1998) rather than the full range of amateurs' publics. COL's publics are identified as both popular and professional communities, including other COL members, family, local communities, private organisations and professional meteorologists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influx of new pickers, together with the realization that wild mushrooms had substantial economic value, prompted demands for the Forest Service and other federal and state agencies to limit or prohibit commercial harvesting on public lands (McLain, Christensen, and Shannon 1998). By the end of the 20th century, a web of federal and state regulations shaped when, where, and how people could harvest mushrooms in the Pacific Northwest region of the United States.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%