1989
DOI: 10.3386/w2977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When are Contrarian Profits Due to Stock Market Overreaction?

Abstract: The profitability of contrarian investment strategies need not be the result of stock market overreaction. Even if returns on individual securities are temporally independent, portfolio strategies that attempt to exploit return reversals may still earn positive expected profits. This is due to the effects of cross-autocovariances from which contrarian strategies inadvertently benefit. We provide an informal taxonomy of return-generating processes that yield positive [and negative expected profits under a parti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

52
631
6
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 489 publications
(691 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
52
631
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The individual stock returns within each industry are more volatile, and autocorrelations are smaller and generally negative, averaging between 0.0 and -0.14. These return characteristics are consistent with those reported for earlier sample periods (see Lo and MacKinlay (1990), Moskowitz and Grinblatt (1999) and others).…”
Section: Empirical Evidencesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The individual stock returns within each industry are more volatile, and autocorrelations are smaller and generally negative, averaging between 0.0 and -0.14. These return characteristics are consistent with those reported for earlier sample periods (see Lo and MacKinlay (1990), Moskowitz and Grinblatt (1999) and others).…”
Section: Empirical Evidencesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Strategies less than 6-6 months are avoided as they require high-frequency price data which may in turn reflect microstructure impacts (see Lo and MacKinlay, 1990).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-autocorrelations between different stocks or stock portfolios are reported by Lo and MacKinlay [1990]; Conrad, Kaul, and Nimalendran [1991] and Badrinath, Kale, and Noe [1995]; studies which find lead-lag patterns for international stock markets include Eun and Shim [1989]; Arshanapalli and Doukas [1993]; Richards [1995]; Soydemir [2000]; and Masih and Masih [2001]. Lead-lag relations between stock indices and stock index futures are investigated by Kawaller, Koch, and Koch [1987]; Stoll and Whaley [1990]; and Chan [1992].…”
Section: Endnotesmentioning
confidence: 96%