Two studies were conducted to investigate the nature of teacher questioning and its relationship to what learners consider important to remember when processing exposition. Specifically, we wanted to determine if teachers who are asked to write questions over an expository passage focus those questions on segments of text that have been determined to be of high, medium, or low structural importance. Further, we wanted to compare the questions that teachers ask with those that their students predict they would ask in order to assess students' strategic ability to determine what information is instructionally important. The results of the initial study demonstrated that neither teachers nor their students are highly influenced by structural importance when writing questions. The results generally supported the hypothesis that students are cognizant of what teachers value in text (i.e., instructional importance) and seem guided by this understanding when processing exposition. In Study II, we examined the questioning patterns of three physical science teachers as they developed quizzes and led discussions over a segment in their course textbooks. Results again demonstrated that students are relatively aware of the information that their teachers will test and that this information is not necessarily structurally important. Other similarities and differences between teacher and student questions are discussed and implications for research and practice presented.
20
Journal of Reading BehaviorThe role of interest and importance in text comprehension has become the focus of much research in the past decade (e.g., Anderson, Shirey, Wilson, & Fielding, 1987;Garner, Gillingham, & White, 1989;Hidi & Baird, 1986Hidi, Baird, & Hildyard, 1982;Schank, 1979;Wade & Adams, 1990). Some researchers concerned with interest and text learning have investigated those aspects within the text itself that have captured students' attention and have thus affected comprehension. Schiefele (1991) classifies this dimension of interest as "situational" interest. Because the text is the means by which students' interests are gauged, Hidi (1990) more specifically refers to this dimension as "text-based" interest. One outcome of the research on situational, text-based interest is the realization that readers' attention during text processing is often drawn to information that appears highly interesting but of little structural importance (e.g., Wade & Schraw, 1991). For instance, students reading a passage about Horatio Nelson are much more likely to remember content related to his sexual conquests than his naval ones (Wade & Adams, 1990). Likewise, students reading a passage about Stephen Hawking are more apt to remember information about a wager Hawking made with a colleague than they are to remember anything about his research on Grand Unification Theory (Garner, Alexander, Gillingham, Kulikowich, & Brown, 1991). Because of their effect on text processing, referred to these highly intriguing but relatively unimportant text segments as...