2015
DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.12926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Children are the Least Vulnerable to False Memories: A True Report or a Case of Autosuggestion?

Abstract: In this case report, a legal case revolving around the reliability of statements given by a 6-year-old girl is described. She claimed to have witnessed her mother being murdered by her father. Two psychological experts provided diametrically opposed opinions about the reliability of her statements. One expert, a clinician, opined that the girl's statements were based on autosuggestion whereas the other expert, a memory researcher, stated that autosuggestion was unlikely to have played a role. This case and the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lesson from the current experiments is that a child’s age can no longer be used as a predictor of their reliability as an eyewitness. Indeed, in many criminal cases, expert witnesses regularly (falsely) assume that young children are more apt to produce most kinds of memory errors, whether they arise spontaneously or due to suggestion-induced pressures (for a recent case, see Brackmann, Otgaar, Sauerland, & Jelicic, 2015 ). However, there are perhaps other forensic ramifications of our findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lesson from the current experiments is that a child’s age can no longer be used as a predictor of their reliability as an eyewitness. Indeed, in many criminal cases, expert witnesses regularly (falsely) assume that young children are more apt to produce most kinds of memory errors, whether they arise spontaneously or due to suggestion-induced pressures (for a recent case, see Brackmann, Otgaar, Sauerland, & Jelicic, 2015 ). However, there are perhaps other forensic ramifications of our findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This latter type of false memory has been referred to as spontaneous false memories . Both types of false memories can arise in legal cases and in clinical settings ( Brackmann, Otgaar, Sauerland, & Jelicic, 2016 ; Howe et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: False Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because all child participants in Experiment 2 had previously participated in Experiment 1, apparently some children learned from their experience in that experiment that not all test slides had been shown during study. Children's rejection of new slides in Experiment 2 suggests that their willingness to recognize new slides in Experiment 1 is better explained by their desire to be agreeable with the experimenter (Brackmann et al, 2016) than a false memory (Otgaar et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In Experiment 1, children and adults recognized missing slides more often than new slides, supporting our hypothesis. The significant main effect of age was driven primarily by children being likelier to respond "yes" to new slides, which could either indicate children having more false memories than adults (Otgaar et al, 2016), or children trying to be agreeable to the experimenter (Brackmann et al, 2016). Unfortunately, it is difficult to distinguish between these possibilities, but the contrast between the two experiments' results might provide some insight, as described below.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation