2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-020-02666-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When clarity and consistency conflicts with empirical adequacy: conceptual engineering, anthropology, and Evans-Pritchard’s ethnography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In his well-known handbook Abraham Kaplan noted: "Tolerance of ambiguity is as important for creativity in science as it is in anywhere else" (Kaplan, 1964, p. 71). Conceptual inconsistencies and unclarities may be beneficial for increasing empirical adequacy in such fields as anthropology (Djordjevic, 2020) or they may help integrate certain forms of knowledge, e.g. in biology (Neto, 2020).…”
Section: Methodological Feasibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his well-known handbook Abraham Kaplan noted: "Tolerance of ambiguity is as important for creativity in science as it is in anywhere else" (Kaplan, 1964, p. 71). Conceptual inconsistencies and unclarities may be beneficial for increasing empirical adequacy in such fields as anthropology (Djordjevic, 2020) or they may help integrate certain forms of knowledge, e.g. in biology (Neto, 2020).…”
Section: Methodological Feasibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%