2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.wdp.2020.100204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When climate change is not psychologically distant – Factors influencing the acceptance of sustainable farming practices in the Mekong river Delta of Vietnam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is concurrent with results from other studies, where farmers also perceived the ease of use to be an important factor in the adoption of environmentally friendly rice cultivation practices in Vietnam (Tu et al, 2018) and also in the South Chinese province Guangdong, for the reduction of fertilizer use in rice farming (Wehmeyer et al, 2020). Benefit perceptions seem to play a significant role to follow 1M5R which is in line with results from a study investigating the acceptance of new rice straw management practices in the Mekong River Delta (Connor et al, 2020). Furthermore, farmers indicated that these practices fit their current cropping pattern, are suitable for their field conditions, and labor costs are reduced.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is concurrent with results from other studies, where farmers also perceived the ease of use to be an important factor in the adoption of environmentally friendly rice cultivation practices in Vietnam (Tu et al, 2018) and also in the South Chinese province Guangdong, for the reduction of fertilizer use in rice farming (Wehmeyer et al, 2020). Benefit perceptions seem to play a significant role to follow 1M5R which is in line with results from a study investigating the acceptance of new rice straw management practices in the Mekong River Delta (Connor et al, 2020). Furthermore, farmers indicated that these practices fit their current cropping pattern, are suitable for their field conditions, and labor costs are reduced.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The study finds that socioeconomic characteristics and personal needs, as well as environmental factors such as soil properties, irrigation water, access to agricultural inputs, market demands, weather conditions, and extension activities all influenced the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices (Bopp et al, 2019). Recently, factors such as farmers’ perception of how easy the practice is to apply (Wehmeyer et al, 2020), benefit perceptions (Connor et al, 2020; Ekane et al, 2016), and perceptions of farmer satisfaction and expectations from the introduction process (Wehmeyer et al, 2020) have also been shown to affect the level of adoption of new agricultural technologies and practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is pertinent in West Africa and the Mekong Delta respectively, where different practices at varying scales underpin vital food security and national economies, yet where the risk of malnourishment also persists [6]. Climate change and population increase pose additional future challenges on the agricultural sector to meet increasing demands [5], but potential benefits can be made under these scenarios if appropriate and well informed land management decisions are made [8]. However, these must be relevant at the field-scale level, which has not been possible thus far due to the ongoing under-representation of knowledge at this scale across regional domains [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the logit regression model, which is used to understand why the Indian farmers choose each crop residue practice, social influence was found as a significant determinant of residue burning [18]. Additionally, weather (humidity and rain), disproportionate incentives, inefficient straw collection technology, inefficient management from agricultural agencies, lack of logistic facilities (baler machines, storage and transportation), lack of capital to manage straw, and a low level of skills and knowledge were found for Malaysian farmers, where farmers also realized the benefits of rice straw burning due to it having no serious impacts, and being the easier and cheaper option [10]. Although the farmers perceived high risks, few benefits, low acceptance for rice straw burning [10], and an awareness of its adverse environmental effects [18], they retained their burning practice [10,18].…”
Section: Factors Influencing Farmers' Decision To Choose Rice Straw Management Practices 221 Factors Influencing Burning Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the significant perception variables for Vietnamese farmers to incorporate were the negative impacts of open-field burning, awareness of environmental regulations, and attitude towards incentives. They adopted and incorporated these perception variables for themselves rather than for the environment or society [10].…”
Section: Factors Influencing Non-burning Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%