When Collections of Creatives Become Creative Collectives: A Field Study of Problem Solving at Work

Abstract

babechky@ucdavis.edu} T his paper introduces a model of collective creativity that explains how the locus of creative problem solving shifts, at times, from the individual to the interactions of a collective. The model is grounded in observations, interviews, informal conversations, and archival data gathered in intensive field studies of work in professional service firms. The evidence suggests that although some creative solutions can be seen as the products of individual insight, others should be regarded as the products of a momentary collective process. Such collective creativity reflects a qualitative shift in the nature of the creative process, as the comprehension of a problematic situation and the generation of creative solutions draw from-and reframe-the past experiences of participants in ways that lead to new and valuable insights. This research investigates the origins of such moments, and builds a model of collective creativity that identifies the precipitating roles played by four types of social interaction: help seeking, help giving, reflective reframing, and reinforcing. Implications of this research include shifting the emphasis in research and management of creativity from identifying and managing creative individuals to understanding the social context and developing interactive approaches to creativity, and from a focus on relatively constant contextual variables to the alignment of fluctuating variables and their precipitation of momentary phenomena.

Governing Knowledge in the Scientific Community: Exploring the Role of Retractions in Biomedicine

“…This stands in sharp contrast to the emerging analytical traditional examining other institutional arrangements that undergird scientific progress and allow for high levels of productivity and rapid knowledge accumulation (Dasgupta andDavid, 1994, Stephan, 1996;Mokyr, 2002). Our analysis is prompted more broadly by increasing concerns over governance -particularly of fraud or the falsification of information -among other communities engaging in distributed knowledge production (Hargadon and Bechky, 2006). For example, participants in Wikipedia have expressed rising concern spurred by the identification of the long-running fraud of one of its most frequent contributors (see Doran 2007).…”

Game Changer: The Topology of Creativity

“…Whether one relies on biologists, 2 mathematicians, 3 musicians (Gould 1994), or economists (Schumpeter [1942] 2012; Weitzman 1998), there is strong support for the notion that a novel, innovative idea is the result of recombination (Lopes 1992;Hargadon and Bechky 2006;Stark 2009;Carnabuci and Bruggeman 2009). In order to be creative, the team needs the requisite diversity of stylistic elements available for reworking.…”

Subsidiary managers’ knowledge mobilizations: Unpacking emergent knowledge flows

“…Although mobilizing experience by itself can reinforce previousknowledge accumulation paths and thus cause inertia, it can also stimulate creative outcomes if reframed through the interpersonal interactionof seeking help (Hargadon & Bechky, 2006). Valuing the knowledge located at the same site and the efficacy of face-to-face exchanges, subsidiary managers sought experience from peers in local management who might have encountered similar issues in their particular areas.…”