2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2012.00950.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When “Conservative” Anionic Tracers Aren't

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nitrate‐N concentrations deserve mention, as they ranged from 0.1 to 147 mg/L with an average of 32 mg/L (geometric mean = 17.9 mg/L), substantially higher than the drinking water standard of 10 mg NO 3 − − N/L. Such a wide range in NO 3 − − N concentrations over a few meters is common in North Dakota Aquifers, apparently a result of denitrification (Korom et al 2005, 2012; Schuh et al 2006; Schuh 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nitrate‐N concentrations deserve mention, as they ranged from 0.1 to 147 mg/L with an average of 32 mg/L (geometric mean = 17.9 mg/L), substantially higher than the drinking water standard of 10 mg NO 3 − − N/L. Such a wide range in NO 3 − − N concentrations over a few meters is common in North Dakota Aquifers, apparently a result of denitrification (Korom et al 2005, 2012; Schuh et al 2006; Schuh 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The high correlation ( r = 0.756 in Table 4) between Cl − and SO 4 2− concentrations (Factor 3) indicate that these anions were behaving similarly. Chloride is a common groundwater tracer because of its “conservative” behavior in many sediments (Kaufman and Orlob 1956; Davis et al 1980); however, like all anions, Cl − may be influenced by anion exclusion or anion adsorption (Korom and Seaman 2012). Sulfate is more susceptible to precipitation and chemical reduction; however, at this site, the water was undersaturated with respect to gypsum (CaSO 4 ·2H 2 O) (Figure S3) and, with ample NO 3 − available, denitrification is thermodynamically favored over sulfate reduction (Korom 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sorption was a consideration for all four tracers used, and therefore imposes recognized limitations on the comparison of BTCs. The findings of previous research experiments have suggested indiscernible sorption of bromide in the Borden aquifer (e.g., Mackay et al 1986); however, bromide has been shown to undergo marked sorption at other sites (Korom and Seaman 2012). While RWT has been used as a conservative tracer in groundwater (e.g., Pang et al…”
Section: Observations Of Formation Pressurizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The mechanisms affecting chloride concentration in groundwater and surface water at VAES streams appear unique to the groundwater and surface water. Chloride transport in groundwater can be affected by an array of mechanisms, which make chloride not a reliable conservative tracer [Flewelling et al, 2011;Korom and Seaman, 2012]. The groundwater and stream water of sampled streams each had uniform chloride concentrations respectively, and the distinct chloride signature was used to distinguish the two water bodies.…”
Section: Chloride As a Chemical Marker Of Water Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the mechanisms that contributed to more dilute chloride concentrations in riparian--influenced groundwater at Coal Kiln and Parker Creek are unknown and could be manifold. Some of the processes could be chloride adsorption by a highly weathered soil [Korom and Seaman, 2012], microbial uptake or chlorination of organic compounds [Bastviken, 2007], or dry deposition of chloride from seasalt spray. Perhaps contributing to the different concentrations is chloride from fertilizers, which elevate the riparian--bypass concentration.…”
Section: Chloride As a Chemical Marker Of Water Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%