2019
DOI: 10.1007/s42413-019-00031-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Do Development Projects Enhance Community Well-Being?

Abstract: Many development agencies and governments now seek to engage directly with local communities, whether as a means to the realization of more familiar goals (infrastructure, healthcare, education) or as an end in itself (promoting greater inclusion, participation, well-being). These same agencies and governments, however, are also under increasing pressure to formally demonstrate that their actions 'work' and achieve their goals within relatively short timeframesexpectations which are, for the most part, necessa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Public participation (sometimes known as public involvement or engagement) is mandated in some agency-led land use planning by many federal laws, but this cannot guarantee environmental justice without concerted efforts to ensure that participation is anti-racist and meaningful [ 45 ]. As Woolcock [ 46 ] notes, “Many development agencies and governments now seek to engage directly with local communities, whether as a means to the realization of more familiar goals (infrastructure, healthcare, education) or as an end in itself (promoting greater inclusion, participation, well-being).” Yet, the latter is often at odds with economic forces and project timelines in which developers have different end goals than local community residents and businesses [ 46 ]. Integrated into community benefits agreements or ordinances, HIAs may be tools for agency staff to engage and identify community concerns, in a way that puts the most heavily impacted community at the center of complex infrastructure decisions to better understand vulnerability and impacts, as well as potential remedies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public participation (sometimes known as public involvement or engagement) is mandated in some agency-led land use planning by many federal laws, but this cannot guarantee environmental justice without concerted efforts to ensure that participation is anti-racist and meaningful [ 45 ]. As Woolcock [ 46 ] notes, “Many development agencies and governments now seek to engage directly with local communities, whether as a means to the realization of more familiar goals (infrastructure, healthcare, education) or as an end in itself (promoting greater inclusion, participation, well-being).” Yet, the latter is often at odds with economic forces and project timelines in which developers have different end goals than local community residents and businesses [ 46 ]. Integrated into community benefits agreements or ordinances, HIAs may be tools for agency staff to engage and identify community concerns, in a way that puts the most heavily impacted community at the center of complex infrastructure decisions to better understand vulnerability and impacts, as well as potential remedies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(See, for details, Berggren and Nilsson 2016). These effects are dampened when societies invest in institutional infrastructure (Arampatzi et al 2019;Woolcock 2019).…”
Section: Quality Of Institutions and Tolerance: Theoretical Linksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women's empowerment spans goals that cover key areas critical to their progress and well-being as well as society as a whole (Woolcock, 2019). The main focus is gender equality, ensuring women have the same rights as men in various aspects of life, from education to employment to important decision making (Razavi, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%