2014
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01121-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Does 2 Plus 2 Equal 5? A Review of Antimicrobial Synergy Testing

Abstract: In this age of emerging antibiotic resistance, limited therapeutic options exist for treating multidrug-resistant organisms. Combination therapy is commonly employed to manage these infections despite little laboratory guidance as to the efficacy of this approach. Synergy testing methods have been used to assess the interaction of antibiotic combinations in vitro. This review will discuss the four primary methods used to assess synergy, as well as the data that exist for testing of cystic fibrosis. In the fina… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
294
0
9

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 328 publications
(306 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
294
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…This discrepancy has been documented by different investigators. 38,39) The lack of correlation between the checkerboard and killing-curve methods is also observed in this study. Nevertheless, the checkerboard method was used with the aim of selecting adequate concentrations to be assayed by time-kill studies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This discrepancy has been documented by different investigators. 38,39) The lack of correlation between the checkerboard and killing-curve methods is also observed in this study. Nevertheless, the checkerboard method was used with the aim of selecting adequate concentrations to be assayed by time-kill studies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Furthermore, comparison of results between them is not possible due to variations in techniques and the criteria to classify the interactions. 6,37,38) It should be noted that the checkerboard method assesses bacteriostatic activity only, while time-kill studies test both bacteriostatic and bactericidal activities. This discrepancy has been documented by different investigators.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination also promoted sustained bacterial killing when assessed using a time-kill methodology. Due to the degree of heterogeneity in methodology and the interpretation of in vitro synergy studies, there is still debate about the relevance of these data to clinical practice (27). This applies also to our findings, although it should be noted that, when using SBPI as a marker for useful synergy, values many magnitudes above the theoretical pharmacodynamic breakpoint were observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…We next investigated the mechanism by which this combination of compounds with different modes of action achieved its negative effect on bacterial cells. Time-kill assays, as defined by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, are a favored methodology for distinguishing between bacteriostatic and bactericidal activities, as well as if an effect of this type is synergistic or additive (33). When examined in this fashion, all of the combinatorial antibiotics except CTX for E. coli (four for E. coli and two for S. aureus), when in the presence of DFP, reduced the cell number below that of the starting inoculum over time and proved more potent at reducing the overall density of the population relative to each individual drug at 24 h ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%