2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.09.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When does data envelopment analysis outperform a naïve efficiency measurement model?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, according to Spearman's rank correlation analysis, there are no big differences between the results for the original method (EWSM) and the WSM Conjoint and Conjoint DEA results. This conclusion is consistent with Buschken's claim [65] that the naive model almost perfectly replicates the DEA efficiency scores for constant return-to-scales and low input-output data heterogeneity. Therefore, it can be concluded that the heterogeneity of input-output data is essential to take advantage of the DEA capability.…”
Section: Verification Of the Dea Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, according to Spearman's rank correlation analysis, there are no big differences between the results for the original method (EWSM) and the WSM Conjoint and Conjoint DEA results. This conclusion is consistent with Buschken's claim [65] that the naive model almost perfectly replicates the DEA efficiency scores for constant return-to-scales and low input-output data heterogeneity. Therefore, it can be concluded that the heterogeneity of input-output data is essential to take advantage of the DEA capability.…”
Section: Verification Of the Dea Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Teacher ranking has become increasingly objective over the past few years thanks to new methods, a systematic approach and well-developed, organized academic networks and databases [65]. Mester [66] states that the leading indicators for the metric of teachers' scientific research work are: number of citations, h-index, and i10 index.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Research Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stochastic frontier approaches (SFAs) and data envelopment analyses (DEAs) are the main methods used to measure total factor productivity in academic circles; this can avoid the structural deviation caused by the misunderstanding of production function, such as occurs in the traditional accounting method and SFA method [54][55][56]. In view of this, the traditional DEA model cannot solve the problem of relaxation variable, and when the efficiency of efficient decision-making units is 1, the units cannot be distinguished well.…”
Section: The Measurement and Decomposition Of The Green Total Factor ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we had only one output measure, caveat of correlation between output items was avoided and dimensions kept low in out DEA model. Both Büschken (2009) and Lin (2007) argued lower amount of dimensions to be key for valid efficiency evaluation. Based on Büschken (2009) it is more important to have heterogeneity between different parameter values than to have numerous inputs and outputs at use.…”
Section: Paper Mill's Distribution Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Büschken (2009) and Lin (2007) argued lower amount of dimensions to be key for valid efficiency evaluation. Based on Büschken (2009) it is more important to have heterogeneity between different parameter values than to have numerous inputs and outputs at use.…”
Section: Paper Mill's Distribution Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%