2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11121-009-0159-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Early Crime Prevention Goes to Scale: A New Look at the Evidence

Abstract: It is a widely held view--in both research and policy communities--that desirable effects on delinquency and later offending from early prevention trials will attenuate once they are "scaled-up" or "rolled-out" for wider public use. Some of the main reasons for this include a reduced level of risk, a more heterogeneous population, insufficient service infrastructure, and loss of program fidelity. If attenuation of program effects is not only possible but is highly probable, then the issue for researchers and p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
77
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some evidence supports the positive impact of nurse home visiting programs on reducing infant injuries when the program is implemented with small samples, 2,3 it has been reported that community-wide implementation of the same programs reduces participation and retention rates by up to 67%, 4 decreases implementation fidelity by up to 50%, 5 and raises challenges in finding adequate community resources to meet every family' s identified needs. 6 Distressingly, Matone et al 7 found 14% more injuries for home-visited infants than matched comparison infants when an evidencebased program was scaled up in a community setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some evidence supports the positive impact of nurse home visiting programs on reducing infant injuries when the program is implemented with small samples, 2,3 it has been reported that community-wide implementation of the same programs reduces participation and retention rates by up to 67%, 4 decreases implementation fidelity by up to 50%, 5 and raises challenges in finding adequate community resources to meet every family' s identified needs. 6 Distressingly, Matone et al 7 found 14% more injuries for home-visited infants than matched comparison infants when an evidencebased program was scaled up in a community setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In program evaluation, there is ongoing debate about the relationship between the quality of research designs and the validity of study outcomes (Weisburd et al 2001;Welsh et al 2010). By comparing two different designs, the current study will contribute further evidence to this important discussion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For example, results from non-experimental designs are often compared to those obtained from the randomized "gold standard." In one such kind of study, the researcher performs a meta-analysis of effect sizes from experimental and non-experimental studies, and determines what non-experimental design features yield mean effect sizes that are closest to experimental designs (Heinsman and Shadish 1996;Weisburd et al 2001;Welsh et al 2010). In another kind of study, the researcher utilizes data from a field experiment and merges it with large-scale, non-experimental datasets to conduct a search for the comparison group and statistical method(s) that provide the best approximation to the experimental design (Heckman and Smith 1999;LaLonde 1986).…”
Section: Agenda For the Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boston, and other municipalities seeking to promote these partnerships, face the common problem of bringing innovative and effective programs "up to scale" (see, e.g. Welsh, Sullivan, & Olds, 2010). The participants had a number of ideas on how these partnerships could be spread to a broader set of neighborhoods and individuals.…”
Section: We Trust You But Not That Much 25mentioning
confidence: 99%