2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When expert recommendation contradicts peer opinion: Relative social influence of valence, group identity and artificial intelligence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings extend the work conducted in previous studies that highlight issues associated with the use of AI in services (e.g. Shank et al, 2019 ; Wang et al, 2020 ). Our findings reveal that customers are willing to sacrifice important elements of conventional services if AI-enabled services are personalised and offer a high-quality service.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These findings extend the work conducted in previous studies that highlight issues associated with the use of AI in services (e.g. Shank et al, 2019 ; Wang et al, 2020 ). Our findings reveal that customers are willing to sacrifice important elements of conventional services if AI-enabled services are personalised and offer a high-quality service.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Together, these findings provide empirical support for findings from previous studies that highlight the significance of trust in AI technology (e.g. Wang, Molina, & Sundar, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, relevant stimuli (i.e., recommended results by AI technology versus human experts) will cause further assessment and emotion during the secondary appraisal stage. Individuals' evaluation and emotions will defer depending on the types of recommendation source (i.e., AI intelligence versus human expert) [12][13][14]. In the context of AI service acceptance, consumers will evaluate its costs and benefits based on perceived performance and expectation [15] and then form the emotions toward AI service usage.…”
Section: Aidua Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include how information filtering is structured or which types of filtering systems are utilized in the field [7][8][9][10] and which recommendation algorithms can effectively improve recommendation quality [9][10][11]. Several scholars have focused on consumer-related issues, such as the comparison of AI versus human expert recommendation services [12][13][14] and consumer acceptance of AI devices in service encounters [6], especially using the technology acceptance model (TAM) [15,16]. However, research on AI recommendation services from a consumer perspective is still limited because the literature does not explore consumers' psychological mechanism of how and why individuals accept AI recommendation services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%