When Feedback Interventions Backfire: Why Higher Performance Feedback May Result in Lower Self‐Perceived Competence and Satisfaction with Performance

Abstract

This is the submitted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link AbstractIn relative performance evaluation systems, appraisers may choose to adopt stricter or laxer evaluation criteria. When laxer (stricter) criteria are used, higher absolute performance evaluations become easier (harder) to achieve. Thus, each appraisee's absolute performance feedback and the mean of the distribution of absolute performance feedback are shifted upward (downward). Yet, relative performance remains constant. When evaluation outcomes depend solely on relative performance, can the adoption of laxer (stricter) criteria-leading to higher absolute performance feedback but no change in relative performance-influence appraisees' satisfaction with performance? Despite the ubiquity of such systems in organizations, research has not addressed this question. This article points to an important gap between practitioners' beliefs and research findings. We show that while most appraisers believe that higher absolute performance feedback will automatically result in more satisfaction with performance, the opposite may also happen. Specifically, we find that appraisees with a stronger (weaker) chronic or contextual need to engage in social comparison are more satisfied with lower (vs. higher) absolute performance feedback. Overall, we demonstrate why and how feedback interventions in relative performance evaluation systems may backfire, and suggest a set of practical guidelines for maximizing appraisees' satisfaction with performance in such systems.

Is coworker feedback more important than supervisor feedback for increasing innovative behavior?

“…The HRM literature is littered with differing conceptualizations of feedback (e.g., Gabriel et al, 2014;Kuvaas et al, 2017;Luffarelli, Gonçalves, & Stamatogiannakis, 2016). In general, feedback in a work context refers to the provision of advice by others at work, usually the supervisor, on an employee's behavior and job performance.…”

A systematic review and meta-analysis: the effect of feedback on satisfaction with the outcome of task performance

“…Lack of Report Mean and/or Standard Deviation. (Campbell et al., 1986; Liden et al., 1988; Luffarelli et al., 2016; Schul and Schiff, 1995)…”

A Review of the Influencing Factors of Ratee Performance Appraisal Satisfaction

“…This is because the high score is conducive to intrinsic motivation of the ratees, and they will be more satisfied with performance appraisal. But Luffarelli (2016) believes that the relationship is moderated by social comparison orientation [10]. When ratees like to compare, they receive no intrinsic motivation even if they receive higher performance appraisal results but lower relative performance rankings.…”