2020
DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Hedging Goes Wrong: Lessons from Ukraine’s Failed Hedge of the EU and Russia

Abstract: When confronted by the competing zero‐sum regional strategies of the EU and Russia between 2010 and 2013, Ukraine chose to aggressively pursue a dual‐aligned hedge. This policy choice, in part, helped precipitate a disastrous outcome: the Ukraine crisis. Using the insights of the literature on smaller power hedging and regional security complex theory, it is argued that Viktor Yanukovych misperceived the geopolitical feedback emanating from the Eastern Europe security complex, leading it to pursuing a suboptim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another important factor to consider when assessing Nepal’s hedging strategy is regional permissiveness. According to Smith (2020), hedging in a regional setting marked with enmity, hostility and bipolarity is highly susceptible to failure as emphasised by their case study of Ukraine in relation to the EU and Russia. Similarly, due to a rise in Sino-Indian hostilities and a lack of security structure, the South Asian region has also been marked with enmity, hostility and bipolarity which makes it inimical to hedging.…”
Section: Assessing the Effectiveness Of Nepal’s Hedgingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important factor to consider when assessing Nepal’s hedging strategy is regional permissiveness. According to Smith (2020), hedging in a regional setting marked with enmity, hostility and bipolarity is highly susceptible to failure as emphasised by their case study of Ukraine in relation to the EU and Russia. Similarly, due to a rise in Sino-Indian hostilities and a lack of security structure, the South Asian region has also been marked with enmity, hostility and bipolarity which makes it inimical to hedging.…”
Section: Assessing the Effectiveness Of Nepal’s Hedgingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, New Zealand has adopted an asymmetric hedging strategy 17 to manage the fact its key security and economic needs have diverged, requiring positive relations with two competing sets of actors -traditional partners for security and China for trade. Given its location in the South Pacific far from major markets (Australia being the closest at 4,000km away), trade has been a key concern of New Zealand governments ever since it was a British colony.…”
Section: Small State Theory and New Zealandmentioning
confidence: 99%