When History Matters: Baltic and Polish Reactions to the Russo-Georgian War

Abstract

The outbreak of the Russo-Georgian war sparked a very strong and swift reaction from the Baltic states and Poland. In contrast to other European states, they did not hesitate to accuse Russia of initiating the conflict and sought to punish it for its alleged imperialist ambitions. Traditional variables of national economic, geopolitical or security interests fall short of accounting for such acute sensitivity by Baltic and Polish politicians. Instead, this article argues that identity politics driven by historicalpsychological legacies provide the most plausible explanation. The case illustrates how third parties decide their level of engagement in conflicts that have limited strategic importance to them.

Historical experiences, strategic culture, and strategic behavior: Poland in the anti-ISIS coalition

“…While Poles today see Germany as a partner with which relations should be built, Russia remains "unreformed and imperialistic" (Longhurst 2013, p. 367). According to Lašas (2012), the Polish view of Russia is based on traumatic and painful experiences before, during and after World War II, in particular the so-called Katyn massacre (pp. 1062-1063) 5 :…”

The Jagiellonian Idea and Poland's Eastern Policy: Historical Echoes in Today's Approach

“…70 Lašas has also argued that the responses of the governments of Poland and the Baltic states to the outbreak of the war between Russia and Georgia in 2008 were largely the result of identity politics driven by historical--psychological legacies that stemmed from these states' shared and traumatic experiences of the Second World War. 71 Nonetheless, even if Russia's actions have not yet produced a united front among the various states which once belonged to the Commonwealth, they have at least forced the European Union and NATO to refocus their attention upon the security situation in the east. As Ballinger has noted, the territorial ambitions of Putin's Russia and its dependencies (like Crimea) have infused the language of eastern and western alliances with renewed political and military salience.…”