2018
DOI: 10.1177/1046496418775829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Ignorance Is Bliss: Exploring Perspective Taking, Negative State Affect and Performance

Abstract: Whereas the positive relationship between positive affect in teams and team performance is well established, the relationship between team negative affect and team performance seems to be subject to moderating effects. We focus on the effects of perspective taking as one of these moderators, and posit that perspective taking impedes team performance when team state affect is negative because team members become preoccupied with others' negative emotions. Results from 49 teams involved in a computerized interac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that perspective-taking is an important characteristic of in-group gossip (cf. Davis, 1983;Beersma et al, 2018;Righi & Takács, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that perspective-taking is an important characteristic of in-group gossip (cf. Davis, 1983;Beersma et al, 2018;Righi & Takács, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one example, while several important emergent states such as cohesion, collective efficacy, task interdependence, transactive memory, and trust occupy key roles in our topic networks, terms such as “group affect,” “group mood,” and “affective tone” do not appear in our analyses. While three papers within the SGR corpus do address the phenomena of group affect, and incorporate the keywords “positive group affective tone” (Shin, 2014), “negative affect” and “positive affect” (Beersma et al, 2018), and “group mood” (Lehmann-Willenbrock et al, 2011) respectively, these individual mentions and lack of connection to other topics did not warrant these papers focus in our analyses, which reflects the overall lack of focus on group affect in the small group literature (Barsade & Knight, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PDM focuses on cognitive strategies in social situations. Thus, social-cognitive variables such as cognitive flexibility, selfawareness, empathy, and perspective-taking may be fruitful avenues for research aimed at understanding responses to these situations [62][63][64][65][66]. We also recommend research examining PDM scores of physicians at different career stages and in different specialties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%