2022
DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Innovation and Commercialization Collide: A Patient Advocate View in Neuroblastoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of this work needs to be conducted with an eye toward subsequent regulatory file and access of novel agents for our patients. 93 With increasing understanding of the molecular basis of neuroblastoma, there are numerous rationally targeted agents in development. The challenges moving forward remain how best to identify, prioritize, and combine novel agents to improve the treatment of HRNB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of this work needs to be conducted with an eye toward subsequent regulatory file and access of novel agents for our patients. 93 With increasing understanding of the molecular basis of neuroblastoma, there are numerous rationally targeted agents in development. The challenges moving forward remain how best to identify, prioritize, and combine novel agents to improve the treatment of HRNB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where drug approvals are necessary to change standard of care, the need to satisfy scientific, regulatory, and reimbursement requirements must also be a key consideration. 32 Questions over EFS as the best trial endpoint have persisted as both CCG-3891 and COG-ANBL0532 reported significant differences in EFS but not OS. Supporting the notion of discordant EFS and OS, survival after relapse, and lack of survival advantage with transplant in the immunotherapy era, a retrospective analysis of 170 patients treated at MSK between 2003 and 2013, 60 of whom had received prior transplant, reported five-year EFS favoring the transplant group (65% vs 51%) but near identical five-year OS (76% vs 75%).…”
Section: Efs Versus Osmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…End‐of‐induction response as an even earlier endpoint for efficacy in future studies is currently the subject of some discussion given its well‐established prognostic association with improved survival. Where drug approvals are necessary to change standard of care, the need to satisfy scientific, regulatory, and reimbursement requirements must also be a key consideration 32 …”
Section: Exploring the Controversiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient advocates can play many roles in research, for example, championing accessing stored tissue and aiding the recruitment of trial participants. Their early engagement in study concept discussion could lead to valuable insight for industry to better understand the treatment pathway, patient community and commercialisation impact [62]. 9.2.…”
Section: Patient Advocates' Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%