When is age dissimilarity harmful for organisational identification? The moderating role of age stereotypes and perceived age-related treatment

Abstract

Due to demographic changes, age diversity is growing in the workplace, creating a potential challenge to social integration. However, who is most affected by working with colleagues of different ages and when is being dissimilar in age from others more likely to hinder organisational identification? Drawing on relational demography and on the social identity approach, we suggest that certain individual and contextual conditions can lead employees to react to greater age dissimilarity by reducing their psychological attachment to the organisation. We propose that negative age stereotypes and perceived age-related treatment affect the salience of age as a social category for employees and threaten their age group identity, thereby creating conditions in which age dissimilarity might hinder organisational identification. We therefore examine the moderating effects of negative age stereotypes and perceived age-related treatment on the relationship between age dissimilarity and organisational identification in a sample of 434 schoolteachers from 16 schools in Italy. Findings show that age dissimilarity per se is not sufficient to hamper employees’ identification with the organisation. However, it has detrimental effects when employees hold negative age stereotypes and/or perceive an unfair organisational treatment towards their own age group. Implications for research are discussed along with practice implications.

Young stars and red giants: The moderating effect of age diversity on the relationship between the proportion of high performers and team performance.

“…This study adds to ongoing research in this area by showing that age diversity has another highly important benefit for teams in that it moderates the effect of high performers on team performance. The study sheds light on one way in which high performers who are older than other team members can be more valuable for their teams than their younger counterparts (Pritchard & Whiting, 2014; Sammarra et al, 2020). This finding is arguably particularly important because of the general discrimination older individuals often face in organizations (Muller-Camen et al, 2011; Posthuma & Campion, 2009; Standifer et al, 2013).…”

Differential effect of age in academia: a three-way interaction effect of age, technological aids and knowledge sharing on research output

“…Moderating effect of age on technology aids, knowledge sharing, and research output Extending the above arguments, it is believed that the legacy of KS between older and younger employees is crucial for knowledge retention in an organization (Burmeister and Deller, 2016). The literature recognizes age as an important factor in determining the relationship between employees' psychological state and workplace behavior (Sammarra et al, 2021). While studying the moderating effect of age on the relationship between an employee' psychological state and KS, Chen et al (2021) found out that with aging, the employee psychological state had a reduced effect on knowledge collecting and donating.…”

“…Extending the above arguments, it is believed that the legacy of KS between older and younger employees is crucial for knowledge retention in an organization (Burmeister and Deller, 2016). The literature recognizes age as an important factor in determining the relationship between employees' psychological state and workplace behavior (Sammarra et al. , 2021).…”

Age separation and voluntary turnover: Asymmetric effects for collective turnover rates and individual turnover intentions depending on age

“…Whereas the general assumptions of social identity and self-categorization theories overlap-they both imply that age differences trigger the formation of in-and outgroups based on age-their theoretical focus is different (Hornsey & Hogg, 2000). Specifically, the self-categorization perspective focuses on harmful intergroup processes, whereas the social identity perspective focuses on why social categorizations occur (Hogg & Terry, 2000)-that is, people's fundamental desire for a positive social identity through their belongingness to a distinct social in-group (Sammarra et al, 2021;Shore et al, 2011). This calls for a different and ultimately more nuanced view on the link between age separation and turnover.…”