1999
DOI: 10.1300/j001v18n01_08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Is Counseling an Appropriate and Ethical Supervision Function?

Abstract: In this paper the authors outline ethical standards associated with the use of counseling behaviors within supervision. They begin by demonstrating why it is unethical to provide personal psychotherapy for one's supervisees. The counselor's role in supervision as initially described by Bernard (1979), however, involves appropriate and ethical counseling behaviors for purposes of student assessment and training. Strategies for facilitating development of reflective skills and the use of self as an instrument fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants in the current study felt that some space to process this material as it related to their client work would have greatly helped with their willingness to British Journal of Guidance & Counselling 219 disclose the difficult material and further improve their supervisory working alliance (Sumerel & Borders, 1996). The complexity of boundary management in relation to dealing with personal supervisee issues in supervision has been an area of discussion in the literature (Allstetter Neufeldt & Nelson, 1999;Hermansson, 1997), with Ladany, Friedlander, and Nelson (2005) stating that while personal issues may need to be acknowledged as impacting upon the therapy work and addressed in this context, 'the goal is not to work through the supervisee's personal problems as a therapist would ' (p. 196).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants in the current study felt that some space to process this material as it related to their client work would have greatly helped with their willingness to British Journal of Guidance & Counselling 219 disclose the difficult material and further improve their supervisory working alliance (Sumerel & Borders, 1996). The complexity of boundary management in relation to dealing with personal supervisee issues in supervision has been an area of discussion in the literature (Allstetter Neufeldt & Nelson, 1999;Hermansson, 1997), with Ladany, Friedlander, and Nelson (2005) stating that while personal issues may need to be acknowledged as impacting upon the therapy work and addressed in this context, 'the goal is not to work through the supervisee's personal problems as a therapist would ' (p. 196).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in some instances, the supervisor may attribute the cause of deficits in clinical skills to personal issues of the supervisee that would benefit from clinical intervention. Neufeldt and Nelson (1999) pointed out that there are serious ethical issues relating to the dual relationship that may develop when the supervisor moves into the role of therapist of the supervisee. These authors ask whether a supervisee can give genuine informed consent to therapy in supervision situations.…”
Section: Perceptions Of Good and Bad Supervisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This definition does distinguish therapy from supervisionÐ an important distinction, given the ethical problems than can arise in a dual relationship of this kind [2]. However, there remains a potential for some functional overlap when the supervision reviews clinical material that is distressing, discouraging or traumatic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we define supervision as a working alliance between practitioners in which they aim to enhance clinical practice, fulfil the goals of the employing organization and meet ethical, professional and best-practice standards of the organization and the profession, while providing personal support and encouragement in relation to the professional practice [1]. This definition does distinguish therapy from supervisionÐ an important distinction, given the ethical problems than can arise in a dual relationship of this kind [2]. However, there remains a potential for some functional overlap when the supervision reviews clinical material that is distressing, discouraging or traumatic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%