When it’s good to be a bad nurse: expanding risk orders theory to explore nurses’ experiences of moral, social and identity risks in obstetrics units

Abstract

Discourses about health risks can have major implications for individuals and cultures. In this article, we use risk orders theory to examine nurses' perceptions of patient safety risk in Obstetrics departments of US hospitals. According to risk orders theory, risk discourses can create social worlds that have the capacity to threaten individuals' social bonds, identity and moral character, and the imaginative potential of entire cultures. Risk orders theory proposes three orders of risk. First-order risks are constructed from claims about tangible dangers that individuals believe result from their actions or inactions. Second-order risks are threats experienced by individuals because of communication about first-order risk, including threats to social relationships or social risks, and threats to the sense of moral character or moral risk. Third-order risks are threats to collective agency and imagination underpinning shared culture. In this article, we draw on data from a survey of obstetric nurses who attended the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses conference in 2010 in Las Vegas, Nevada. We use a qualitative thematic analysis of 131 obstetrics nurses' narrative responses on a critical incident survey to refine theoretical constructs of risk orders theory. We identified a third type of second-order risk, identity risks, or threats to the sense of self. We also identified three types of third-order risks: agencyconstraining risks threaten members of a culture's ability to act freely; agentconstraining risks threaten cultural members' ability to define themselves freely; double-binding risks threaten their ability to make choices freely. We found that second-order and third-order risks did threaten some obstetrics nurses' social bonds, identity as a nurse, moral character and imaginative potential.

“I’m Not Comfortable With COVID, But …”: Dilemmas and Decision-Making to Mitigate Risks Among Mothers Who Gave Birth During the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…First-order physical risks are commonly thought of as the direct result from certain (in)actions (Striley & Field-Springer, 2016). For example, a mother may believe that if she maintains her routine and sends her baby to daycare, then the baby is at risk for contracting COVID-19.…”

“…By maintaining her routine in the face of physical danger, the mother's inaction incurs risk of getting sick. First-order risks tend to be common topics for discussion and reflect individual and collective values (Striley & Field-Springer, 2016). Through conversations, we construct our choices and enable ourselves to trust that certain actions will mitigate risks to future harms, which perpetuates judgments of others behaving differently.…”

“…These interconnected second-order risks are brought about by individuals’ (in)actions responding to first-order risks. Second-order risks are simultaneously constructed socially, reflecting an individual’s socially constituted values (Striley & Field-Springer, 2016). While first- and second-order risks represent threats to the individual, third-order risks function for the collective.…”

Preserving nurses’ professional dignity: Six evidence‐based strategies

“…It is not easy to stay true to the principles and values of being a good nurse under such circumstances. Compromising nursing standards under pressure while knowing what is right imposes moral risk on nurses (Striley & Field-Springer, 2016). Professional nurses experience a diverse work environment and its complexity as difficult and hard to deal with (Kuwano et al, 2016).…”

Hub of medical expertise or medicalised conveyor-belt? Sharing meanings online on the hospital birth setting

“…As this advice partly repeals or heavily qualifies previous risk guidance where hospital births were promoted as the best, safest birth setting option, pregnant women in the UK now find themselves at a decision point regarding where to give birth where the stakes seem very high -nothing less than the safe delivery of their babies, as well as the personal riskiness of potentially making a bad decision (Striley/Field-Springer 2016). Given the instability of medical advice on birth setting and the challenges involved in deciding where to give birth, many women seek the experiential knowledge (Caron-Flinterman/Broerse/Bunders 2005) and perspectives of their peers online.…”