2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Karma strikes back: A model of seller manipulation of consumer reviews in an online marketplace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite possible bias, reviews exert significant influence and often surpass personal experience when it comes to making consumer decisions (Chen et al, 2022;Zhao et al, 2012). Whilst these reviews may lack reporting and purchasing bias and may even be fake, they still influence purchasing decisions (Chakraborty, 2019;Wu and Qiu, 2023), making them valuable decisionmaking tools.…”
Section: User-generated Content Decision Science and Corporate Perfor...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite possible bias, reviews exert significant influence and often surpass personal experience when it comes to making consumer decisions (Chen et al, 2022;Zhao et al, 2012). Whilst these reviews may lack reporting and purchasing bias and may even be fake, they still influence purchasing decisions (Chakraborty, 2019;Wu and Qiu, 2023), making them valuable decisionmaking tools.…”
Section: User-generated Content Decision Science and Corporate Perfor...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2012). Whilst these reviews may lack reporting and purchasing bias and may even be fake, they still influence purchasing decisions (Chakraborty, 2019; Wu and Qiu, 2023), making them valuable decision-making tools.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In marketing research, review valence has been found to have a significant impact on perceived usefulness and behaviorial intentions [13,14], however, the research results are inconsistent as to whether positive or negative reviews have a greater impact on consumer responses [15]. According to negativity bias [16,17], many studies indicated that negative reviews are more useful than positive reviews and have a greater impact on consumers' purchase decisions [3,13,14]. Nonetheless, some other studies have found that regarding hedonic consumption (e.g., tourism, music), consumers perceive negative reviews to be less useful than positive reviews [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is important to note that positive e-WOM is not always genuine. Companies may engage in astroturfing, a practice where they create fake positive reviews to manipulate consumer perception [21]. This can ultimately backfire and harm the brand's reputation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%