“…Many narrative reviews are limited to a particular invasive taxon, either more broadly to plants (Richardson et al 2000; Mitchell et al 2006) or animals (Snyder and Evans 2006), or to a single functional group or species (e.g., zebra mussels, Karatayev et al1997; ants, Wetterer et al 2006) or they focus on specific geographic regions (e.g., Foxcroft et al 2010), habitats (e.g., Van Auken 2000; Weis 2011), or on particular aspects of invasions such as ecological or economic impacts (e.g., Mack and D'Antonio 1998; Kenis et al 2009). Other reviews have emphasized more specific questions, for example, focusing on efforts to quantify the prediction of the success of invasive plants and birds (e.g., Kolar and Lodge 2001), impacts of invasive plants (Vilà et al 2011; Pyšek et al 2012), or comparisons of native and invasive species in more limited subsets of species and restricted regions (e.g., Blackburn and Duncan 2001; Cadotte and Lovett-Doust 2001; Allen et al 2006). So, in addition to relying upon formal systematic review methodology, our research synthesis is more comprehensive than previous reviews.…”