1975
DOI: 10.1126/science.1111097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Left-Handed Mice Live in Right-Handed Worlds

Abstract: Many C57BL/6J inbred mice were tested for paw preference. In unbiased worlds, approximately 10 percent exhibited lateral preferences inconsistent with the world bias, and males were more strongly lateralized. Influences of world bias appear to be superimposed upon an already laterally dichotomized population. Initial left-right sense, it is posited, arises as an outcome of a seemingly random process.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
90
1
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
7
90
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Only about 10% of the mice in this experiment showed a paw preference inconsistent with the environmental bias. However, in contrast to the classic Collins experiment [7], we expectedly observed a larger genetic than non-genetic effect in the present data, as 78% of the children with a head-tilt to the right and a rotation of face and chin to the left were right-handed, although their visual experience of their hands would favour left-handedness. Therefore, a model incorporating both genetic and non-genetic influences on handedness would be the most suitable one to explain the present data.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only about 10% of the mice in this experiment showed a paw preference inconsistent with the environmental bias. However, in contrast to the classic Collins experiment [7], we expectedly observed a larger genetic than non-genetic effect in the present data, as 78% of the children with a head-tilt to the right and a rotation of face and chin to the left were right-handed, although their visual experience of their hands would favour left-handedness. Therefore, a model incorporating both genetic and non-genetic influences on handedness would be the most suitable one to explain the present data.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…There is also evidence for an impact of a non-genetic experience based factor on behavioural asymmetries in non-human mammals. For example, pawedness in mice is strongly influenced by an environmental bias that favours a left-or right-sided preference [7]. Only about 10% of the mice in this experiment showed a paw preference inconsistent with the environmental bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Although their ridden training cannot be attributed to the unbiased result due to the unridden horses also being unbiased, it is possible that this ambidextrous training has kept horses unbiased in limb preference, as environmental factors have been demonstrated to affect handedness in humans. Studies of human twins suggest that handedness is influenced by environment more than biology (Collins, 1975), and the increase in proportions of people who are left-handers, from about 2% to over 10%, probably due to less social pressure to be right-handed (Levy, 1974;Brackenridge, 1981) is also evidence of an environmental effect on handedness. Another example of motor bias being influenced by environment is that in humans, practice affects performance in various motor bias tests (Corballis, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is possible that equal riding to the left and right may reduce any inherent motor bias, as the relationship between asymmetrical brain function and motor asymmetries is similar across vertebrate species (Rogers and Andrew, 2002), and in humans and mice, environmental factors such as motor training influenced motor preferences (Levy, 1974;Collins, 1975;Brackenridge, 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like handedness in humans, paw preference in mice, as assessed in a food-reaching task, has been widely used as a robust index of functional brain asymmetry to dissect out the genetic and physiological mechanisms underlying lateralization (Cabib et al, 1995;Collins, 1975Collins, , 1985Denenberg et al, 1991;Nielsen et al, 1997;Nosten et al, 1989;Signore et al, 1991b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%