When Left Is Right and Right Is Left: The Psychological Correlates of Political Ideology in China

Abstract

A robust empirical literature suggests that the development of one's political ideology is the product of an “elective affinity” between the discursive, socially constructed elements of ideological belief systems and the psychological constraints, motives, and interests of those who are drawn to those belief systems. However, most studies which support this elective affinity theory have been conducted in the West. In the present study, we tested the theory in China to see whether elective affinities between psychological traits and political ideology are more likely to be universal. Across a nationally representative sample (N = 509), we found initial support for the characterization of the left‐right divide in China, albeit in reverse. Namely, the “liberal Right in China mostly evinces traits of the psychological Left in the West (e.g., lower intolerance of ambiguity), while the “conservative Left” mostly evinces traits of the psychological right in the West (e.g., higher system justification). Epistemic motives were most reliably related to political ideology, while existential and relational motives were more mixed; economic and political aspects of ideology were more closely linked to psychological traits than social/cultural aspects. The present findings provide an extension of existing theory and opportunities for further development.

System justification motivation as a source of backlash against equality‐promoting policies—and what to do about it

“…Presumably, this is because the secular humanist ideals associated with the Enlightenment values of liberté, egalité, fraternité are by now so culturally entrenched that they constitute the societal status quo in France. In China, too, general system justification scores are correlated with leftist rather than rightist political orientation, consistent with the fact that the social system is, at least officially, ideologically aligned with left-wing socialism (Beattie et al, 2022). Jost (2020, tab.…”

Categorical Confusion: Ideological Labels in China

“…This paper contributes to a burgeoning literature on the nature of ideology in authoritarian regimes by examining the coherence of ideological self-conceptualizations among the general public. In this way it complements previous work on the structure of political preferences in public opinion, which focused more on psychological traits (Beattie et al 2021), or the latent structure of citizen beliefs (Cantoni et al 2017;Ji and Jiang 2020;Nathan and Shi 1996;Pan and Xu 2018;Wu and Meng 2016).…”

Crime and Punishment: How Historical Narratives Affect the Evaluation of Restorative and Retributive Justice

“…To guarantee validity, the scale was built using statements found in online media and social networks of Colombian politicians. Different types of political compasses have been used in the literature to provide information about ideological preferences (Beattie et al, 2022). Consistently, in this case, we included political compass’ items to control for the effects of prior ideological beliefs.…”