2009
DOI: 10.1017/s0003055409990220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Left Is Right: Party Ideology and Policy in Post-Communist Europe

Abstract: According to the classic partisan theory of spending, leftist parties are expected to increase government spending, and rightist parties are expected to decrease it. We argue that this relationship does not hold in post-Communist countries, where in the context of dual transition to democracy and to a market economy, leftist parties have had stronger incentives and better opportunities to enact tighter budgets, whereas rightist parties were compelled to spend more in order to alleviate economic hardships. We i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
131
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
4
131
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Within Western Europe, the left has historically been associated with social change and government efforts to promote greater political, social, and economic equality, while the right has opposed change and supported a more hierarchical social, political, and economic order (Lipset et al 1954). Such distinctions are either much weaker or have disappeared entirely in former Communist countries (Van Hiel andKossowska 2007, Tavits andLetki 2009). Indeed, the left in former Communist countries is not identified with social change and equality (Markowski 1997, Thorisdottir et al 2007, and the standard relationship between right-wing orientation and traditionalism and acceptance of inequality is significantly weaker in former Communist countries than it is in Western Europe (Thorisdottir et al 2007).…”
Section: The Eu Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within Western Europe, the left has historically been associated with social change and government efforts to promote greater political, social, and economic equality, while the right has opposed change and supported a more hierarchical social, political, and economic order (Lipset et al 1954). Such distinctions are either much weaker or have disappeared entirely in former Communist countries (Van Hiel andKossowska 2007, Tavits andLetki 2009). Indeed, the left in former Communist countries is not identified with social change and equality (Markowski 1997, Thorisdottir et al 2007, and the standard relationship between right-wing orientation and traditionalism and acceptance of inequality is significantly weaker in former Communist countries than it is in Western Europe (Thorisdottir et al 2007).…”
Section: The Eu Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Governing coalitions, too, are frequently odd compromises between leftist and rightist parties (Druckman and Roberts 2007;Grzymala-Busse 2001). When in advanced democracies consistent behavior by parties may help clarify their positions, 7 party behavior in the nonelectoral arena-possibly motivated by alternative strategic considerations (Druckman and Roberts 2007;Grzymala-Busse 2001;Tavits and Letki 2009;Tzelgov 2011)-does not allow for such a possibility. For these reasons, several authors have pointed out that voters in new democracies are more likely to be confused about the ideological differences between parties than voters in advanced democracies (Grzymala-Busse 2006;Rose 1995) and that voter attachments to parties are weaker (Evans and Whitefield 1993;Ezrow, Tavits, and Homola, n.d.).…”
Section: Extremism Reduces Uncertainty In New Democraciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 In an interesting development, Tavits and Letki (2009) argued that the real problem for understanding left-right politics in the CEE region is not actually the placement of the parties on the left-right scale. Rather, what is uncommon and somewhat new is that the parties on the left pursue the traditional policies of the right (e.g.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%