2015
DOI: 10.1037/a0039460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When mindfulness is therapy: Ethical qualms, historical perspectives.

Abstract: In the past 20 years, mindfulness therapeutic programs have moved firmly into the mainstream of clinical practice and beyond. As they have, we have also seen the development of an increasingly vocal critique. At issue is often less whether or not these mindfulness practices "work," and more whether there is a danger in dissociating them from the ethical frameworks for which they were originally developed. Mindfulness, the argument goes, was never supposed to be about weight loss, better sex, helping children p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
84
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(81 reference statements)
1
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This confluence is proving extraordinarily creative -there is an upsurge of mindfulness-informed and mindfulness-based programs and approaches across medicine, psychology, and psychotherapy, and beyond, into business and education. There are also inherent tensions to navigate in the process of integrating paradigmatically different disciplines (Harrington & Dunne, 2015;Crane, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This confluence is proving extraordinarily creative -there is an upsurge of mindfulness-informed and mindfulness-based programs and approaches across medicine, psychology, and psychotherapy, and beyond, into business and education. There are also inherent tensions to navigate in the process of integrating paradigmatically different disciplines (Harrington & Dunne, 2015;Crane, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerns have been expressed from a variety of angles: from a religious perspec ve, the secular 'dilu on' of Buddhist forms of medita on as mindfulness has been framed by some to be misappropria on (Wilks, 2014;Gooch, 2014); moralis c stances have that theore cal instability or philosophical 'fence si ng' has led to inappropriate commodifi ca on within social systems and markets, as well as ethically dubious applica on in contexts like military training (Barker, 2014;Davies, 2014;Davis, 2015); and scholarly or scien fi c concern has o en focused on issues of theore cal and methodological superfi ciality (Tang, Hölzel, & Posner, 2015;Davidson & Kaszniak, 2015). Some mindfulness discourse communi es have ac vely sought to address these cri cisms through engaged conversa ons about the intended future of their subfi eld, as well as explicit eff orts towards philosophical clarifi ca on and analy c development (Dimidjian & Segal, 2015;Harrington & Dunne, 2015;Tang & Posner, 2013;Lutz et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a concept, mindfulness has remained undertheorized and oversimplifi ed; however, it can also be argued that this general under-determina on has contributed to its success, including ongoing liberal applica on in disparate se ngs, with at-mes incommensurable inten ons (Lutz et al, 2015;Dodson-Lavelle, 2015;Harrington & Dunne, 2015). The most widely disseminated and accepted defi ni on within the literature is an opera onaliza on that is simultaneously accessible and monolithic, by Kabat-Zinn.…”
Section: Philosophical Underpinnings Of Mindfulnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of this historical distinction into scientific discourse about the effects of secularized mindfulness programs has engendered considerable debate about the degree to which these programs require an ethical framework to bring about personal or social benefits (48)(49)(50). It would be ironic if the secularization of the construct of mindfulness for broad dissemination in the West incidentally capitalized on its perceptual skill element at the expense of washing out an organically embedded focus on moral conduct (50,51).Finally, although at N = 185 our sample was large for a behavioral observation study, the sample size limited the magnitude of the effects that we were powered to detect. The present study had statistical power to detect effects that would consensually be deemed at least medium in magnitude, but cannot rule out the possibility of small effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%