2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cophys.2019.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When networks walk a fine line: balance of excitation and inhibition in spinal motor circuits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
5
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the strengths of synchronization here were relatively weak, thus supporting the view of vertebrate spinal cord interneurone networks as being sparse (Nielsen et al 2005;Radosevic et al 2019), itself consistent with the projection patterns of individual thoracic interneurons (Saywell et al 2011). The concurrent inhibition and excitation in the rat motoneurones here might be interpreted as an example of balanced excitation and inhibition, which has been proposed as a general principle in the organization of motor systems (Berg et al 2019). Our observations of peak/trough combinations could support this idea, so long as the peaks and troughs were really linked, i.e., if the same common inputs were responsible for both.…”
Section: Functional Considerationssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, the strengths of synchronization here were relatively weak, thus supporting the view of vertebrate spinal cord interneurone networks as being sparse (Nielsen et al 2005;Radosevic et al 2019), itself consistent with the projection patterns of individual thoracic interneurons (Saywell et al 2011). The concurrent inhibition and excitation in the rat motoneurones here might be interpreted as an example of balanced excitation and inhibition, which has been proposed as a general principle in the organization of motor systems (Berg et al 2019). Our observations of peak/trough combinations could support this idea, so long as the peaks and troughs were really linked, i.e., if the same common inputs were responsible for both.…”
Section: Functional Considerationssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The corresponding spike activity for the same data set containing the 4 inhibitory activity is shown in blue (Fig. 8c), where one inhibitory unit is concurrently active with excitation, while three are alternating, indicating the complexity of the population activity 39 . The verified synaptic connections give a connectivity probability of only 0.9% of inhibitory input, and even lower for the excitatory units (none detected).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spinal inhibition has traditionally been associated with sculpting of the motor rhythm via reciprocal connections 2,12 or modulation of gain during motor control. 20 Nevertheless, since active decorrelation occurs in networks with a balance between excitation and inhibition, 23,24 and such concurrent E/I activity has been observed in spinal motor networks under certain circumstances, 51,52,53,39 it is quite possible that part of the low correlation could be explained by this mechanism. In our simulations of active decorrelation (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8c), where one inhibitory unit is concurrently active with excitation, while three are alternating, indicating the complexity of the population activity. 39 The verified synaptic connections give a connectivity probability of only 0.9% of inhibitory input, and even lower for the excitatory units (none detected). Similar low estimates (1%) has previously been obtained indirectly in the medulla respiratory system.…”
Section: Local Connectivity Is Sparsementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation