2021
DOI: 10.1080/15230430.2021.1994103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When no color pattern is available: Application of double observer methods to estimate population size of the Alpine salamander

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, we relied on the assumption that clutch count matches the total number of females breeding in a pond (Lodé et al, 2005). In future studies, alternative approaches such as the double observer approach could provide more accurate estimates of abundance (Nichols et al, 2000; Romano et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, we relied on the assumption that clutch count matches the total number of females breeding in a pond (Lodé et al, 2005). In future studies, alternative approaches such as the double observer approach could provide more accurate estimates of abundance (Nichols et al, 2000; Romano et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, although considering that very rare species have a limited ecological relevance on the biotic interaction across the realized community, finding new tools to allow analysis of rare species is of paramount importance. In this respect, multinomial N-mixture models, relying on different sampling protocols, such as multiple observers (Costa et al 2020;Romano et al 2021) or mark-recapture distance sampling (Rosa et al 2022b), have proved to be a reliable and cost-effective tool to estimate abundance and other demographic parameters of amphibians and reptile populations, even when density and detection probability are low (Costa et al 2020). Therefore these model may represent a promising pathway for inferring species co-occurrence and interaction also for rare reptile species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surveys were timed to spot the peak of the breeding season of the two frogs and, during the sampling, the two observers walked across the entire wadable surface of the wetlands to count the clutches of the two species. We adopted a dependent double-observer approach, where a first observer indicates clutches to a second observer, who annotates the number of clutches not seen by the first observer [ 3 , 14 ]. Before beginning the fieldwork, we performed preliminary independent counts in a small subset of ponds and obtained identical counts from the different observers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every wildlife biologist has experienced the frustration of being unable to find any individual of his target species during a field survey, even in habitats where a colleague or a friend has reported several sightings of that species. This can occur because animals are not available in a given moment at a study site, or because the individuals are present but their detection probability is lower than one [ 1 , 2 ], which may depend on their behavior and characteristics, on the environmental conditions at the survey sites, or on the ability level of an observer to detect the individuals in a given area [ 3 , 4 , 5 ]. Overlooking individuals during counts at a site can result in biased estimation of species occurrence and abundance, as well as to misleading inferences on the key parameters of populations or of the relationships between species and habitats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation