2009
DOI: 10.1037/a0016063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When nonsense sounds happy or helpless: The Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT).

Abstract: This article introduces an instrument for the indirect assessment of positive and negative affect, the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT). This test draws on participant ratings of the extent to which artificial words subjectively convey various emotions. Factor analyses of these ratings yielded two independent factors that can be interpreted as implicit positive and negative affect. The corresponding scales show adequate internal consistency, test-retest reliability, stability (Study 1), and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
283
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(300 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
15
283
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The requirement was for ecological momentary assessment during IVF treatment using patients' own phones, allowing them to complete entries in a stress diary and respond to prompts to perform a psychological test (IPANAT [13]) in a secure manner.…”
Section: Ivf Treatment Stress Diarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The requirement was for ecological momentary assessment during IVF treatment using patients' own phones, allowing them to complete entries in a stress diary and respond to prompts to perform a psychological test (IPANAT [13]) in a secure manner.…”
Section: Ivf Treatment Stress Diarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another way of assessing implicit personality is to develop a technique introduced by Quirin and colleagues (see Quirin and Bode 2014;Quirin et al 2009). In this procedure participants indicate the extent to which words from an artificial language (e.g., Tunba) sound like a series of mood adjectives (happy, energetic, helpless, etc.).…”
Section: Implications For Medical Selection Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ao longo dos anos, diversos instrumentos foram criados (Betella & Verschure, 2016;Kammann & Flett, 1983;Mehrabian & Russell, 1974;Quirin, Kazén, & Kuhl, 2009;Scherer, Shuman, Fontaine, & Soriano, 2013;Watson et al, 1988;Yik et al, 2011) com base nas proposições de Russell (1980) e Bradburn (1969. Entre eles, os instrumentos de Kammann e Flett (1983), Watson et al (1988) e Quirin et al (2009) possuem estruturas teóricas semelhantes e baseadas nas dimensões afetos positivos e afetos negativos, enquanto os instrumentos de Mehrabian e Russell (1974), Betella e Verschure (2016), Scherer et al (2013) e Yik et al (2011) apresentam fundamentação teórica similar à do circumplexo, com base nas dimensões valência e ativação.…”
Section: Figura 1 Dimensões E Variáveis Constituintes Do Circumplexunclassified
“…Entre eles, os instrumentos de Kammann e Flett (1983), Watson et al (1988) e Quirin et al (2009) possuem estruturas teóricas semelhantes e baseadas nas dimensões afetos positivos e afetos negativos, enquanto os instrumentos de Mehrabian e Russell (1974), Betella e Verschure (2016), Scherer et al (2013) e Yik et al (2011) apresentam fundamentação teórica similar à do circumplexo, com base nas dimensões valência e ativação. De todas as escalas identificadas na literatura especializada, apenas a PANAS (Carvalho et al, 2013;Zanon & Hutz, 2014) possui evidências de validade no Brasil.…”
Section: Figura 1 Dimensões E Variáveis Constituintes Do Circumplexunclassified