When observers of customer incivility revisit the restaurant: roles of relationship closeness and norms

Abstract

Purpose Considerable research has examined the negative consequences of customer incivility on employees (e.g. turnover intention and sabotage behavior toward the customer). However, there is scant research investigating how other customers, as observers, may react to incivility. This knowledge gap should be filled because hospitality services are often consumed in the public setting where customers can observe and be influenced by each other. The purpose of this study is to fill this gap by examining observing customers’ willingness to revisit the company following customer incivility. Design/methodology/approach Participants are American consumers recruited from a crowdsourced online panel. Two scenario-based experimental studies in the restaurant setting are conducted. Customer incivility and relationship norms (communal versus exchange) are manipulated, while relationship closeness is measured. Findings Study 1 shows that following fellow customer incivility (vs civility), observing customers’ intention to revisit the company was lower when they perceive a distant relationship with the employee. This intention did not differ regardless of incivility and civility when they perceive a close relationship with the employee. Study 2 shows that when observing customers perceive a communal relationship with the employee, their revisit intention was even higher following customer incivility (vs civility). Practical implications Hospitality managers need to train employees to identify signs of customer incivility and assume appropriate actions to reduce the negative consequences on observers. Hospitality managers should also communicate their expectations for respectful customer behaviors through an organization-wide campaign. Finally, hospitality businesses should foster a close relationship with their customers, particularly a communal relationship to offset the negative consequences of customer incivility on observers. Originality/value This study adds to previous research by challenging the universally negative view of customer incivility. The authors do so by examining the moderating effects of relationship closeness and norms in observer reactions to customer incivility. This study contributes to previous research drawing on script theory and deontic justice theory.

Motivations and commitment to work in the hospitality industry: investigating employee psychology and responsible organizational behaviors

“…Industry stakeholders, including policymakers and academia, among others, are increasingly exerting their influence on hospitality businesses to offer decent conditions of employment, to their human resources (Camilleri, 2016; ILO, 2023). Various researchers commend that the hospitality practitioners ought to be fair, honest, trustworthy and respectful toward their employees (Hwang et al , 2022). They posit that human resources managers should look after their valued employees by offering them great working environments, fair and just human resources practices, as well as fun, creative and productive organizational cultures (Mitchell et al , 2020).…”

The black sheep in hospitality organizations: how and when coworker service sabotage hinders employee service creativity

“…Hospitality organizations have long valued the philosophy of “the customer is king” and focused on delivering high-quality service (Hwang et al , 2022; Liu et al , 2022a, 2022b). However, because hospitality employees typically experience income instability, irregular working hours and lack of close supervision during delivery of service (Gip et al , 2023; Zhu et al , 2019), they inevitably encounter challenges in delivering high-quality service and are prone to being caught up in service sabotage.…”

“…Hospitality organizations have long valued the philosophy of "the customer is king" and focused on delivering high-quality service (Hwang et al, 2022;Liu et al, 2022aLiu et al, , 2022b.…”

The impact of customer sexual harassment on customer-oriented OCB: a social exchange perspective

“…CSH can be attributed to the power imbalance between customers and service employees (Good and Cooper, 2016; Liu et al , 2022; Jung and Yoon, 2020). The philosophy of “the customer is king” is widely adopted in hospitality organizations (Lu et al , 2022; Hwang et al , 2022; Ram, 2018), and so customers are encouraged to believe they have power over service employees, which can lead to various pervasive types of customer misbehavior, including CSH (Booyens et al , 2022). Hospitality services also promise the provision of satisfaction and pleasure, which may introduce notions of sexuality into service processes (Dawson et al , 2021; Madera et al , 2019).…”