When open data and data activism meet: An analysis of civic participation in Cape Town, South Africa

Abstract

local civil society organizations have been driving engagement with municipal open data, as a form of data-driven activism. • The notion of "bi-directional open data" is developed here to characterize emerging possibilities for data openness between governments and the public. • We recommend that cities adopt a new philosophy of data openness that embraces civic participation with open data, leading towards city-citizen data relations. Municipal open data projects are motivated by a desire to democratize data access and knowledge production, strengthen transparency, and advance cities socially and economically. However, their effects and implications are insufficiently analyzed. This paper examines civic engagement in open data in Cape Town, South Africa, the continent's first municipal-level open data initiative. Findings reveal how local civil society organizations have been driving engagement with municipal open data as part of their recent turn towards technology and data-driven forms of public engagement and activism. This analysis highlights the important role of the "smart civil society organization"-occupying a position between the smart city and smart citizen-that is developing significant capacity to produce and share data about the city's informal settlements with stakeholders in government, the private sector, and wider society. Minimal engagement with or recognition of civil society efforts illustrates the limits to the city's philosophy of data openness, which is largely restricted to releasing selected government datasets to the public. The notion of "bi-directional open data" is developed here to characterize emerging possibilities for data openness between governments and the public. This may be particularly relevant for cities like Cape Town with a highly active, capable, and data-literate civil society.

Social equity in the data era: A systematic literature review of data‐driven public service research

“…Scholars who focus on distributional equity and argue that data reproduce or exacerbate social equity describe F I G U R E 3 Data and social equity pertaining to group uneven access to government services in areas such as transportation (Zhou et al, 2019), health (Williams & Hunt, 2017), and housing (Ricker et al, 2020). These problems arise out of a lack of access to information technology that collects the data and a lack of access to data itself by vulnerable groups.…”

Addressing new challenges in smart urban planning using Information and Communication Technologies

“…As a result, today the notion of the smart city is conceived in a holistic way as the model for achieving a more sustainable urban development in which, increasingly, the citizens who are at the centre of any smart initiative matter (Cortés‐Cediel et al, 2019; Salim & Haque, 2015; Verdegem & Verleye, 2009). Thus, there have been developments in this regard from the most basic and traditional participatory digital platforms (De Filippi et al, 2020; Johnson et al, 2020) to more complex projects that seek to mobilize the collection of data from people by benefiting from the acceptance of user‐friendly technology (Ricker et al, 2020).…”

Ramener la justice sociale au centre de la carte : propositions pour un renouvellement critique de la cartographie participative axée sur l'<i>empowerment</i>

“…Cette vision spécifiquement et stratégiquement technophile était liée à deux constats en particulier : la connaissance d'expériences internationales et locales mobilisant des technologies numériques en tant que vecteur de revendication, et le rôle prépondérant du numérique dans les politiques du gouvernement local du Cap. Au sujet du deuxième point, effectivement, l'administration municipale du Cap promeut une politique axée sur les données et sur le numérique en tant que levier pour la participation citoyenne dans la fabrique urbaine (Ricker and Cinnamon, 2020). Cette politique définit le référentiel quant à la forme que peuvent (ou doivent) prendre les revendications des habitants des quartiers informels afin de contester, voire de s'aligner sur, la rationalité de l'acteur gouvernemental censé pourvoir à leurs besoins.…”