2020
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8345-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Painlevé–Gullstrand coordinates fail

Abstract: Painlevé–Gullstrand coordinates, a very useful tool in spherical horizon thermodynamics, fail in anti-de Sitter space and in the inner region of Reissner–Nordström. We predict this breakdown to occur in any region containing negative Misner–Sharp–Hernandez quasilocal mass because of repulsive gravity stopping the motion of PG observers, which are in radial free fall with zero initial velocity. PG coordinates break down also in the static Einstein universe for completely different reasons. The more general Mart… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another effect induced by the negative energy density is that it will be impossible to introduce Painlevé-Gullstrand coordinates [51,52] for the line element (4). In fact, these coordinates are associated with observers starting at spatial infinity with zero velocity [53] and they cannot be introduced in regions of negative quasilocal energy [54].…”
Section: Pseudo-newtonian Potential For the Quantum-corrected Black Holementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another effect induced by the negative energy density is that it will be impossible to introduce Painlevé-Gullstrand coordinates [51,52] for the line element (4). In fact, these coordinates are associated with observers starting at spatial infinity with zero velocity [53] and they cannot be introduced in regions of negative quasilocal energy [54].…”
Section: Pseudo-newtonian Potential For the Quantum-corrected Black Holementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This modified metric again asymptotically approaches standard Lense-Thirring (1) at large distances, but now has the two very strong advantages that (i) for J = 0 it is an exact solution of the vacuum Einstein equations and (ii) that the azimuthal dependence is now in partial Painlevé-Gullstrand form: g φφ (dφ − v φ dt) 2 = g φφ (dφ − ωdt) 2 . See the early references [23][24][25], and more recently references [26][27][28][29][30]. We shall soon see that "completing the square" in the Lense-Thirring metric is equivalent to linearizing a suitably chosen tetrad in the Kerr spacetime (trying to explicitly calculate approximate curvature components for this approximate metric is again slightly faster, and the results are again somewhat less horrid).…”
Section: Variants On the Theme Of The Lense-thirring Metricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We shall soon see that "completing the square" in the Lense-Thirring metric is equivalent to linearizing a suitably chosen tetrad in the Kerr spacetime (trying to explicitly calculate approximate curvature components for this approximate metric is again slightly faster, and the results are again somewhat less horrid). • Third, put the r-t plane into standard Painlevé-Gullstrand form [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] (we note that the shift function is v r = − √ 2m/r for a Schwarzschild black hole). We then have the modified metric…”
Section: Variants On the Theme Of The Lense-thirring Metricmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This family of coordinates contains Painlevé–Gullstrand coordinates as a special case and has as a limit the more familiar Eddington–Finkelstein coordinates [ 4 , 5 ]. Painlevé–Gullstrand and Martel–Poisson coordinates have been generalized to arbitrary static and asymptotically flat black hole spacetimes in [ 3 ] and to de Sitter and other static universes in [ 6 , 7 ]. Other coordinates based on radial timelike geodesics in the Schwarzschild geometry are the Novikov and the Gautreau–Hoffman coordinates, corresponding to observers launched at a finite radius [ 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%