2017
DOI: 10.1111/faam.12121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Paradigms Meet: Interacting Perspectives on Evaluation in the Non‐Profit Sector

Abstract: This study examines a public debate in Australia, arising from a national government report, around how social contribution in the nonprofit sector should be assessed. Guided by several meta‐perspectives on evaluation, we identify connections between foundational assumptions and normative positions on evaluation espoused by non‐profit organizations (NPOs), and examine the ways in which the inter‐paradigmatic context of the non‐profit sector contributes to the emergence of NPOs’ different normative positions on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if they took advantage of the reforms that occurred in US business during the 1950s, proponents of positive accounting theory also benefited from the decoupling between the academic world and accounting practice initiated by their predecessors. Neesham et al (2017) When paradigms meet: interacting perspectives on evaluation in nonprofit sector…”
Section: Qualification Preference In Accountancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if they took advantage of the reforms that occurred in US business during the 1950s, proponents of positive accounting theory also benefited from the decoupling between the academic world and accounting practice initiated by their predecessors. Neesham et al (2017) When paradigms meet: interacting perspectives on evaluation in nonprofit sector…”
Section: Qualification Preference In Accountancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short, NPOs already have a holistic influence on their economic, social and ecological environment. Consequently, NPOs seek to perpetuate their positive action on society for as long as possible (Neesham et al, 2017). In other words, the sustainability of actions in NPOs is at the heart of their management.…”
Section: Research Questions Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perceptions towards alternative agriculture may depend on natural and cultural context where respective actors are located, or can be explained through interpretivist-constructivist perspective where it is socially constructed and interpreted by people experiencing it giving rise to differences in its definition geographically and socially (Chaippe & Butler, 1998;Guba & Lincoln, 1989;Neesham, McCormick, & Greenwood 2017). It is against this background that the motivation for this study emerged where a constructivist approach was used to determine what alternative agriculturemeans in Zimbabwe (Charmaz, 2017).…”
Section: 1conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%