2018
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When phylogeny and ecology meet: Modeling the occurrence of Trichoptera with environmental and phylogenetic data

Abstract: Ecological studies are increasingly considering phylogenetic relationships among species. The phylogeny is used as a proxy or filter to improve statistical tests and retain evolutionary elements, such as niche conservation. We used the phylogenetic topology to improve the model for occurrence of Trichoptera genera in Cerrado (Brazilian Savanna) streams. We tested whether parameters generated by logistic models of occurrence, using phylogenetic signals, are better than models generated without phylogenetic info… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the analyses to define the geographical areas of distribution of C. suborbicularis, compared to those of C. flava, showed the former having a more restricted distribution (Fig. 5); these results, together with the reconstruction of evolutionary trajectories based on the ecological niches of the region (Serra-Varela & al., 2015;Godoy & al., 2018), suggest that C. suborbicularis could be considered a native species to the Mayan forest.…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the analyses to define the geographical areas of distribution of C. suborbicularis, compared to those of C. flava, showed the former having a more restricted distribution (Fig. 5); these results, together with the reconstruction of evolutionary trajectories based on the ecological niches of the region (Serra-Varela & al., 2015;Godoy & al., 2018), suggest that C. suborbicularis could be considered a native species to the Mayan forest.…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certainly, phylogenetic niche conservatism was first noted by Darwin (1859) and has since been observed, for example, in birds, mammals, and butterflies in southern Mexico (Peterson et al, 1999) and plants (Prinzing et al, 2001; Ricklefs & Latham, 1992). Additionally, phylogenetically‐informed models were better able to predict ecological responses in Trichoptera (Godoy et al, 2018). Therefore, it may be prudent to explore the utility of phylogenetic or taxonomic information as a predictor of flight ecology in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, by adding the occurrences of sister taxa of each focal species (that is, when we created the U1 or U2 modeling unit), omission rates decreased considerably in the areas of invasion. This result suggests that existing niches of the species were not fully representative of their fundamental niches before invading other regions; when we incorporated presences of the most closely related species, we added relevant and complementary information for the characterization of the fundamental niches ( Godoy, Camargos & Lodi, 2018 ). However, in two of the three species evaluated, predictive power decreased when additional, less closely related lineages were added, probably because these lineages have somewhat diverged in niche characteristics from the focal species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%