2008
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.00793-08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Should “I” Consider a New Hepatitis B Virus Genotype?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2B). To further test the possibility of recombination between the ancestors of the rat TLVs and SAFVs, the grouping scan analysis test for recombination (29,43) was also used. This method failed to find evidence for recombination between TLV of rats and SAFV above the threshold grouping score of 0.5 (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2B). To further test the possibility of recombination between the ancestors of the rat TLVs and SAFVs, the grouping scan analysis test for recombination (29,43) was also used. This method failed to find evidence for recombination between TLV of rats and SAFV above the threshold grouping score of 0.5 (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the C/D recombinant prevails in Tibet and northern China (50). To avoid assigning a new genotype for every newly discovered sporadic recombinant HBV variant, evidence of intergenotypic recombination should be carefully eliminated (14). However, in some cases, designation of a new genotype is proposed by a potential epidemiological significance of a novel genetic variant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, eight genotypes (A-H) have been established based on intergroup divergence of .7.5 % in the complete nucleotide sequence (Arauz-Ruiz et al, 2002;Kramvis et al, 2008;Norder et al, 1994;Okamoto et al, 1988;Stuyver et al, 2000). Recently, a ninth genotype isolated in Laos (Olinger et al, 2008a) and Vietnam (Hannoun et al, 2000;Olinger et al, 2008b;Tran et al, 2008) and tentatively termed 'I' was proposed, although it is still subject to debate (Kurbanov, 2008). In addition, a tenth genotype provisionally termed genotype 'J' was isolated from a Japanese patient (Tatematsu et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%