2021
DOI: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Should Neuroendovascular Care for Patients With Acute Stroke Be Palliative?

Abstract: Noncurative surgeries intended to relieve suffering during serious illness or near end of life have been analyzed across palliative settings. Yet sparse guidance is available to inform clinical management decisions about whether, when, and which interventions should be offered when ischemic stroke and other neurological complications occur in patients whose survival is extended by other novel disease-modifying interventions. This case commentary examines key ethical and clinical considerations in palliative ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the role of endovascular MT is expected to extend beyond palliative therapy. 28,29 Our institutional experience has limitations that include the retrospective nature; absence of 3-month clinical outcome data of 37% of the included patients; lack of detailed oncologic data about the cancer groups, including-and not limited to-the molecular types and the genetics of the tumors; possible selection bias in patients with severe morbid conditions; and the possible effect of the small number of patients in the AM group on the observed statistical differences. In addition, the institutional data for the HOM group did not encompass any patients with a history of metastatic disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the role of endovascular MT is expected to extend beyond palliative therapy. 28,29 Our institutional experience has limitations that include the retrospective nature; absence of 3-month clinical outcome data of 37% of the included patients; lack of detailed oncologic data about the cancer groups, including-and not limited to-the molecular types and the genetics of the tumors; possible selection bias in patients with severe morbid conditions; and the possible effect of the small number of patients in the AM group on the observed statistical differences. In addition, the institutional data for the HOM group did not encompass any patients with a history of metastatic disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For patients with pre-stroke disability due to other serious health conditions or even life-limiting conditions, MT may represent a measure to decrease their sum of harm and alleviate further suffering. Basic ethical principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence make these considerations of offering stroke interventions in those previously disabled or even in a palliative setting justifiable [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%