2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.10.085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Should the Aortic Arch Be Replaced in Marfan Patients?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
2
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
29
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…5,14,20 Our study confirmed this hypothesis. Although aortic arch reintervention was necessary only in patients with initial hemi-arch replacement, elective arch reintervention carried an only moderate risk.…”
Section: Extent Of Initial Surgery Determines the Need For Aortic Roosupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5,14,20 Our study confirmed this hypothesis. Although aortic arch reintervention was necessary only in patients with initial hemi-arch replacement, elective arch reintervention carried an only moderate risk.…”
Section: Extent Of Initial Surgery Determines the Need For Aortic Roosupporting
confidence: 81%
“…[14][15][16] However, this was a rather intuitive recommendation made according to experiences with nondissected patients with MFS because the number of patients with MFS with aortic dissection even at high-volume centers is very low, ranging from 3% to 5% of the entire dissection population. 1,10 Until now, no aortic root preservation outcomes in patients with MFS suffering acute dissection have been published.…”
Section: Extent Of Initial Surgery Determines the Need For Aortic Roomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if the surgical procedure is performed after a Type A dissection, the risk of reintervention increases (3% vs. 33%; P=0.0001). Furthermore, Bachet et al (7) found similar results, concluding that aortic arch replacement is not indicated during elective aortic root surgery. Nonetheless, over decades, the significant likelihood of aneurysmal dilatation in the remnant aortic arch after surgery for Type A aortic dissection is an incentive for considering an aggressive approach towards the aortic arch.…”
Section: Commentssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This autosomal dominant disease is characterized by the presence of cardiovascular disorders affecting mostly the thoracic aorta with an associated decrease in life expectancy (5). The weak tissues and characteristic distal progression of aneurysmal disease in Marfan syndrome have led to the recommendation for aggressive early surgical intervention in the ascending aorta and preemptive aortic arch replacement when a Type A dissection is the presenting event (6,7). The two-stage Elephant Trunk technique fits into this aggressive paradigm and facilitates the correction of coexistent or subsequent descending aortic dilatation (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current studies has shown that, in the long term, the incidence of aortic insufficiency is low when we perform these new mentioned interventions [20].…”
Section: Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 2008; 23(2): 256-261mentioning
confidence: 99%