2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11894-022-00857-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Should the Appropriateness of PEG be Questioned?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, PEG has become the preferred choice for patients needing long-term nutritional support [ 1 , 2 , 3 ], and performs better compared to radiological positioning of feeding tubes [ 9 ]. Moreover, the replacement of gastrostomy feeding tubes after PEG positioning is a procedure that is easily done at a patient’s home, being safe and effective with relevant cost reduction [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, PEG has become the preferred choice for patients needing long-term nutritional support [ 1 , 2 , 3 ], and performs better compared to radiological positioning of feeding tubes [ 9 ]. Moreover, the replacement of gastrostomy feeding tubes after PEG positioning is a procedure that is easily done at a patient’s home, being safe and effective with relevant cost reduction [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its introduction in the clinical arena in the 1980s, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) has become the modality of choice for providing intestinal access to patients with a functional gastrointestinal tract who require long-term enteral nutrition, usually beyond four weeks [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. In addition, there is evidence that PEG is superior to nasogastric tube feeding in improving nutrition and preventing common complications for patients with swallowing disturbances [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%