2015
DOI: 10.1037/per0000132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When social inclusion is not enough: Implicit expectations of extreme inclusion in borderline personality disorder.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
58
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
12
58
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Broadly similar findings were reported in a more recent study of social inclusion simulated by Cyberball with BPD patients (De Panfilis, Riva, Preti, Cabrino, & Marchesi,, 2015). In this study, participants played standard inclusion and exclusion rounds of Cyberball with the addition of an "overinclusion" condition where participants received 45% of throws.…”
Section: Social Exclusion and Cyberballsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Broadly similar findings were reported in a more recent study of social inclusion simulated by Cyberball with BPD patients (De Panfilis, Riva, Preti, Cabrino, & Marchesi,, 2015). In this study, participants played standard inclusion and exclusion rounds of Cyberball with the addition of an "overinclusion" condition where participants received 45% of throws.…”
Section: Social Exclusion and Cyberballsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Although the scale is not formally validated in the Italian population, the very easy and intuitive nature of the questionnaire -being a single item pictorial tool- has contributed to its use with Italian subjects, as documented by earlier works of these authors (Saita et al, 2015a), other Italian researchers (ex. De Panfilis et al, 2015), or studies conducted including Italian samples (Karremans et al, 2011). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This experience elicits sadness and anger in as few as six rounds of play [21], (meta-analysis in [20]). Individuals with BPD and healthy controls report similar emotions after playing Cyberball; the BPD players however report much more intense negative emotion [22]. Furthermore, people with BPD report feeling excluded not only during the rejection paradigm (the other players stop sharing the ball), but also during the fair paradigm (when all players receive the ball an equal number of times), and, of particular interest, the BPD players report feeling excluded despite having accurately perceived how often they got the ball [21].…”
Section: Iiia2 Cyberballmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Furthermore, people with BPD report feeling excluded not only during the rejection paradigm (the other players stop sharing the ball), but also during the fair paradigm (when all players receive the ball an equal number of times), and, of particular interest, the BPD players report feeling excluded despite having accurately perceived how often they got the ball [21]. Negative emotions are reduced, but not fully eliminated, when subjects with BPD receive the ball more times than any other player [22].…”
Section: Iiia2 Cyberballmentioning
confidence: 99%