1975
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1031(75)90003-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When stereotypes hurt: Three studies of penalties for sex-role reversals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
133
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 254 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
8
133
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken together, these differences in working models are consistent with research showing that submissiveness is seen as less acceptable for men than for women (Josephs et al, 1992). Indeed, this expectation may reflect social reality: In a study by Costrich, Feinstein, Kidder, Maracek, and Pascale (1975), submissive men did tend to be devalued by others. We are reluctant to draw many strong conclusions about sex differences from the current data, however, because some of the effects did not reach conventional levels of statistical significance and clearly must be viewed cautiously until replicated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Taken together, these differences in working models are consistent with research showing that submissiveness is seen as less acceptable for men than for women (Josephs et al, 1992). Indeed, this expectation may reflect social reality: In a study by Costrich, Feinstein, Kidder, Maracek, and Pascale (1975), submissive men did tend to be devalued by others. We are reluctant to draw many strong conclusions about sex differences from the current data, however, because some of the effects did not reach conventional levels of statistical significance and clearly must be viewed cautiously until replicated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Rewards and punishments for gendered behaviors are found in many settings (Acker 1990;Costrich et al 1975;Dunn and Skaggs 1999;Hartmann 1993;Hochschild 1983;Jackman 1999;Jones and Remland 1992;Lips 2000;Ridgeway 1997;Ridgeway and Smith-Lovin 1999) and in this case the staff members' beliefs about how men should treat women became structurally legitimated through their position of authority. Staff reinforced gendered behaviors because they were still exposed to normative gendered 9 ideals both in the hospital and outside of the hospital when they left their workplace and entered the "outside world 5 .…”
Section: Gendered Life At Marion Centermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Achievement success is considered male sex appropriate, hence, it is emphasized over affiliative success by males (Broverman, et al, 1970). The affective reactions, and causal attributions generated in response, to comtemplated and/or actual achievement failure by males in the fear of success and failure studies (Costrich, et al, 1975;Feather & Simon, 1973) substantiated this contention.…”
Section: Affiliative Orientation and Gendermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These norms are best understood within the context of sex-role stereotypes. Behavior excessively deviant from such stereotypes is condemned and 23 penalties of loss of affiliative support and social rejection may be incurred (Costrich, Feinstein, Kidder, Marecek, & Pascale, 1975 (Broverman, Broverman, Clarkson, Rosenkrantz, & Vogel, 1970 Stein & Bailey, 1973).…”
Section: Affiliative Orientation and Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%