When the entire population is the sample: strengths and limitations in register-based epidemiology

Abstract

Studies based on databases, medical records and registers are used extensively today in epidemiological research. Despite the increasing use, no developed methodological literature on use and evaluation of population-based registers is available, even though data collection in register-based studies differs from researcher-collected data, all persons in a population are available and traditional statistical analyses focusing on sampling error as the main source of uncertainty may not be relevant. We present the main strengths and limitations of register-based studies, biases especially important in register-based studies and methods for evaluating completeness and validity of registers. The main strengths are that data already exist and valuable time has passed, complete study populations minimizing selection bias and independently collected data. Main limitations are that necessary information may be unavailable, data collection is not done by the researcher, confounder information is lacking, missing information on data quality, truncation at start of follow-up making it difficult to differentiate between prevalent and incident cases and the risk of data dredging. We conclude that epidemiological studies with inclusion of all persons in a population followed for decades available relatively fast are important data sources for modern epidemiology, but it is important to acknowledge the data limitations.

Tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking at diagnosis of head and neck cancer and all‐cause mortality: Results from head and neck 5000, a prospective observational cohort of people with head and neck cancer

“…There are a number of possible explanations for this. First, much of the evidence is based on retrospective analyses of population‐level cancer registries, which are often incomplete or incorrect 40. Consequently, studies have frequently been missing information on important clinical and lifestyle factors such as comorbidity, BMI and socioeconomic position, which could potentially confound the association of smoking with survival.…”

Ophthalmic nepafenac use in the Netherlands and Denmark

“…The entire Danish population is provided free tax‐supported medical care by the National Health Service (Thygesen & Ersboll 2014). For administration and maintenance of this healthcare system, numerous administrative and health registries have been established.…”

Enhancing evidence based medicine: Twelve tips for conducting register-based research

“…Outwardly, there may be few factors differentiating register-based research from traditional epidemiological research, except that data are obtained from registers rather than from surveys or clinical information (Thygesen & Ersboll 2014). Nonetheless, important differences between these data sources do exist (Thygesen & Ersboll 2014).…”

“…Nonetheless, important differences between these data sources do exist (Thygesen & Ersboll 2014). The United Nations Economic Commission of Europe's (2007) report on register-based statistics in the Nordic countries identifies four key features that define a register:…”