When the Law Distinguishes Between the Enterprise and the Corporation: The Case of the New French Law on Corporate Purpose

Abstract

A recent French reform has revised the legal definition of the corporation. In essence, the law stipulates that the corporation must be run with due regard to the social and environmental impacts of its activity. It also introduces the notion of raison d'être and affords the possibility for any corporation to assign social or environmental purposes to itself, defined in its bylaws. This reform is similar to recent reforms in the UK and the US, but is based on an original and distinctive theoretical argument. The aim of our article is to analyze the fundamental tenets of this reform and their implications for the theory of the corporation. It shows that the new law is based on a new positive definition of the enterprise as not only an economic organization or a productive entity, but more fundamentally a space for innovative collective action. We argue that this view of the enterprise challenges our conceptualization of the corporation in two important ways. First, it shows that the traditional theories overlook the activities of the enterprise and their related impacts, and that the corporation is not necessarily the appropriate legal vehicle for the innovative enterprise. Second, it suggests that the stipulation of the enterprise's purpose or raison d'être in the corporate by-laws can provide new promising legal foundations for corporate responsibility.

Reimagining Corporate Social Responsibility in the Era of COVID-19: Embedding Resilience and Promoting Corporate Social Competence

“…The contribution from more inclusive business models can be a key formal mechanism for better livelihoods in response to this global desire, especially in places that traditional businesses and govern-ment programmes fail to reach, by engaging with the most vulnerable communities as one part of a sustained global effort. If the sustainable nature of these companies is recognised and protected by law, they can be (re-)registered as companies explicitly adopting a corporate objective to create a substantial positive impact on society and the environment [144] (p. 6). These companies will not renounce pursuing profit, but will expressly and legitimately embrace the pursuit of other non-financial goals.…”

The Corporate Purpose of Spanish Listed Companies: Neurocommunication Research Applied to Organizational Intangibles

“…Corporate purpose has been identified as one of the fundamental elements in improving corporate culture among banks in the United Kingdom ( Cox and Soobiah, 2018 ). Moreover, in France, the United Kingdom and the United States, it has already been written into law that a corporation must be managed while bearing in mind the social and environmental impact produced by its activity, and to do so, the entity must define its social or environmental purposes in its by-laws ( Segrestin et al, 2020 ). Even though the usefulness of formally incorporating purpose into the constituent documents of corporations has been demanded ( Lin, 2019 ), there is a risk of reducing the capability that an organization needs in order to adapt to the evolution of society, which would lessen the control it could exercise due to having a purpose that has already been defined ( Levillain and Segrestin, 2019 ).…”

A Real Bonds Doctrine

“…People are likely to be more than willing to grasp the nominal returns offered by a government instrument in which real returns are visible in green enterprises dotting town and country. We use the broad brushstroke of the public firm to characterize our business although we welcome the recent distinction made between the corporation and the enterprise (Segrestin et al, 2020). The enterprise emerged at the end of the 19th century, while the genesis of the shareholder value maximization model of the corporation was laid earlier in the distribution of profits to merchants and producers.…”