2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When the regime goes local: Local regulatory arrangements and land use sustainability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The empirical material and methodology exposed here are those of the author's PhD research [7]. Both the research article [1] and the PhD use the Institutional resource regime framework [3] as a theoretical approach.…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The empirical material and methodology exposed here are those of the author's PhD research [7]. Both the research article [1] and the PhD use the Institutional resource regime framework [3] as a theoretical approach.…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To gain a full understanding of the coding, we suggest interested readers to consult the data set [2] attached to the present article. The data set provides:A detailed description of the twelve cases analyzed in the main research article [1]. For each case, we describe the local policy problem faced by authorities, the actors involved in the land use policy implementation process, the strategies they adopted, and the local regulatory arrangement they negotiated;A summary of the twelve land use policy cases analyzed;A synthesis of the evolution of the Swiss institutional soil regime.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sowohl das Baugebot als auch die städtebauliche Enteignung sind bodenpolitische Instrumente (vgl. Hengstermann/Gerber 2015; Hengstermann/Hartmann 2018), da sie neben der nutzungsrechtlichen auch die verfügungsrechtliche Ebene betrachten und darauf abzielen, die beiden Ebenen gegenseitig anzupassen, um so die Inkohärenzen des institutionellen Bodenregimes zu verringern (Gerber/Knoepfel/Nahrath et al 2009;Viallon/ Abstract: Building orders and planning-law expropriations are viewed as particularly interventionist instruments of the Federal Building Code. The two instruments share another characteristic in addition to this high degree of interventionism, namely that they are rarely used in practice.…”
Section: Boris Palmer Und Die Raumplanungunclassified