2014
DOI: 10.1890/es13-00233.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When things go wrong: intra‐season dynamics of breeding failure in a seabird

Abstract: T. Tveraa, and T. Boulinier. 2014. When things go wrong: intra-season dynamics of breeding failure in a seabird. Ecosphere 5(1):4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00233.1Abstract. During breeding, long-lived species face important time and energy constraints that can lead to breeding failure when food becomes scarce. Despite the potential implications of intra-season dynamics in breeding failure for individual behavior, carry-over effects, dispersal decisions and population dynamics, little information is curre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, an important component of the breeding population comprises individuals that are not breeding or have failed in their breeding attempt, and an increasing number of studies aim to quantify the foraging dynamics of these groups and to test whether they show different behaviours compared to breeding adults. Much of the attention has been directed at failed breeders, whose failure may have been natural, a consequence of the deployment, or induced as part of a manipulative experiment (Phillips et al 2005, Bogdanova et al 2011, Ponchon et al 2014. Failed breeders often continue to associate with the colony, operating as central-place foragers but expanding their foraging areas (González-Solís et al 2007).…”
Section: Breeding Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, an important component of the breeding population comprises individuals that are not breeding or have failed in their breeding attempt, and an increasing number of studies aim to quantify the foraging dynamics of these groups and to test whether they show different behaviours compared to breeding adults. Much of the attention has been directed at failed breeders, whose failure may have been natural, a consequence of the deployment, or induced as part of a manipulative experiment (Phillips et al 2005, Bogdanova et al 2011, Ponchon et al 2014. Failed breeders often continue to associate with the colony, operating as central-place foragers but expanding their foraging areas (González-Solís et al 2007).…”
Section: Breeding Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failed breeders often continue to associate with the colony, operating as central-place foragers but expanding their foraging areas (González-Solís et al 2007). The spatial overlap with breeders varies among populations; it can be high (Ponchon et al 2014), moderate , or there may be marked segregation , Reid et al 2014, Clay et al 2016. Further, failed breeders may make visits to other colonies when breeders are still actively rearing chicks; this behaviour is interpreted as prospecting potential new breeding sites and may be motivated by having failed at the current location (Fijn et al 2014, Ponchon et al 2014.…”
Section: Breeding Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since shortened telomeres indicate a deteriorated state or advancing age, we predict that birds with shorter telomeres will forage closer to the colony (Pelletier et al 2014), at shallower depths, and spend less time diving at night. However, in some species, foraging distance from the colony increases when poor conditions decrease food availability (Huettman and Diamond 2001, Buren et al 2012, Ponchon et al 2014, therefore colony conditions may also drive foraging distance, and poor quality birds may forage further from the colony. In addition, we predict birds with deteriorated telomeres will spend less time underwater, indicating decreased foraging efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because adults in the model do not stop feeding the chick when their own mass decreases (as they would in reality, Ponchon et al, 2014), and this should be addressed in future model iterations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%