2017
DOI: 10.4102/sajhivmed.v18i1.734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When to start antiretroviral treatment? A history and analysis of a scientific controversy

Abstract: Background: Since 1987 HIV scientists and activists have debated the optimal point to start antiretroviral treatment. Positions have varied between treating people with HIV as soon as they are diagnosed, based on biological, modelling and observational evidence, versus delaying treatment until points in disease progression at which clinical trial evidence has shown unequivocally that treatment is beneficial.Objectives: Examining the conduct and resolution of this debate may provide insight into how science wor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This early initiation of ARV drugs has a hallmark that the CD4 count remains high which could account for a difference in the prevalence of NCI across the study period. 52–56 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This early initiation of ARV drugs has a hallmark that the CD4 count remains high which could account for a difference in the prevalence of NCI across the study period. 52–56 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This early initiation of ARV drugs has a hallmark that the CD4 count remains high which could account for a difference in the prevalence of NCI across the study period. [52][53][54][55][56] In this study, females were three times more likely to develop NCI than males. This could be due to the high vulnerability of females to contracting HIV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…29,30 Before the introduction of the universal test-and-treat programme, there were concerns that commencing ART among people with high CD4+ T-cell counts would overburden the health system and that those feeling healthy would not adhere to treatment. 31 However, of the PLWH in KwaZulu-Natal with CD4+ T-cell counts of > 500 cells/µL, 78% accepted ART, 32 86% were adherent 33 and 96% achieved viral suppression. 34 Furthermore, retention in care and viral suppression were similar among people who initiated ART with CD4+ T-cell counts of > 500 cells/µL compared to those with lower CD4+ T-cell counts.…”
Section: Challenges For Achieving 95-95-95 In Esa the First 95mentioning
confidence: 99%