2021
DOI: 10.1177/17470218211027695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When two fields collide: Identifying “super-recognisers” for neuropsychological and forensic face recognition research

Abstract: In the last decade, a novel individual differences approach has emerged across the face recognition literature. While the field has long been concerned with prosopagnosia (the inability to recognise facial identity), it has more recently become clear that there are vast differences in face recognition ability within the typical population. “Super-recognisers” are those individuals purported to reside at the very top of this spectrum. On the one hand, these people are of interest to cognitive neuropsychologists… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(173 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Davis and colleagues have also reported using multiple tests, however, applying different tests across studies, including tests lacking scientifically published procedures and normative data. Departing from their original single/same test approach (see above), Bate et al (2021) recommended the use of at least two established tasks for SR screening, however, focusing on memory. The first formal SR diagnostic framework proposed by Ramon (2021) involves three established tests, which collectively assess face perception and face memory.…”
Section: Box 1 Super-recognizer Diagnostics: Lack Of Consensus Experi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Davis and colleagues have also reported using multiple tests, however, applying different tests across studies, including tests lacking scientifically published procedures and normative data. Departing from their original single/same test approach (see above), Bate et al (2021) recommended the use of at least two established tasks for SR screening, however, focusing on memory. The first formal SR diagnostic framework proposed by Ramon (2021) involves three established tests, which collectively assess face perception and face memory.…”
Section: Box 1 Super-recognizer Diagnostics: Lack Of Consensus Experi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several published tests are designed to measure face identity processing ability across the ability spectrum (see [ 8 ] for a recent review, see also [ 9 ]). The most widely used is the Cambridge Face Memory Test which measures the ability to learn and remember unfamiliar faces [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do this, we first used online tests to identify individuals who met specific performance criteria on three standardised tests of unfamiliar face memory and face matching ability. Because there is no universally agreed criterion for selecting super-recognisers (see [ 9 ], c.f. [ 31 ]) we applied two alternative selection criteria and assessed the impact of these criteria on group performance in follow-up tests in our research lab.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation