1999
DOI: 10.1300/j014v20n04_01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Women Lose

Abstract: This paper examines the press coverage of the 1993 Virginia and 1996 West Virginia gubernatorial elections. In both elections, the Democratic Party nominated female candidates, a first in both states. The research seeks to understand if the press was biased against the women candidates and whether or not that bias can be attributed to their gender. While the data collected from newspapers in both states show that the press was negative, the evidence suggests that the negativity was based primarily on issues ot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A significant amount of this research addresses the media coverage of the women's campaigns. Scholars note that due to differences in media coverage, women are at a disadvantage when compared to their male rivals [28][29][30][31][32]; however, some argue that media coverage is becoming more gender balanced [33] and is more reflective of other aspects such as partisanship and incumbency [34].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant amount of this research addresses the media coverage of the women's campaigns. Scholars note that due to differences in media coverage, women are at a disadvantage when compared to their male rivals [28][29][30][31][32]; however, some argue that media coverage is becoming more gender balanced [33] and is more reflective of other aspects such as partisanship and incumbency [34].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%