2005
DOI: 10.1086/429639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where Are the Magnetic White Dwarfs with Detached, Nondegenerate Companions?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
113
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
113
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We here draw attention to the fact that there is no indication for any strong magnetic white dwarf primary in the systems of our sample (and they appear to be pretty rare in pre-CVs in general; Liebert et al 2005;Silvestri et al 2007). These objects therefore will eventually evolve into non-magnetic CVs without anomalous abundances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…We here draw attention to the fact that there is no indication for any strong magnetic white dwarf primary in the systems of our sample (and they appear to be pretty rare in pre-CVs in general; Liebert et al 2005;Silvestri et al 2007). These objects therefore will eventually evolve into non-magnetic CVs without anomalous abundances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Liebert et al (2005) noted the absence of non-accreting magnetic white dwarfs (MWDs) among the more than 1200 WDMS binaries compiled by Silvestri et al (2007) and various other samples (Marsh 2000;Ritter & Kolb 2003;Schreiber & Gänsicke 2003;Morales-Rueda et al 2005;Shimansky et al 2006). MWDs are clearly underrepresented in current WDMS samples compared to the ∼10% fraction in the field (Liebert et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MWDs are clearly underrepresented in current WDMS samples compared to the ∼10% fraction in the field (Liebert et al 2003). As a first possible solution to this fact, Liebert et al (2005) suggested that, analogous to single magnetic white dwarfs, the magnetic white dwarfs in WDMS binaries are more massive, and therefore smaller and less luminous compared to those in non-magnetic WDMS binaries which could result in an observational bias against their detection. However, Silvestri et al (2007) convincingly demonstrate that such systems would be easily identified, if they were present in the SDSS data base.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remarkably, not a single observed close, detached binary system (in which the primary is a WD and the companion is a low-mass main-sequence star) contains a HFMWD (11)(12)(13). If the magnetic field strengths of white dwarfs were independent of binary interactions, then the observed distribution of isolated WDs should be similar to those in detached binaries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%