Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3369457.3369501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where Are They Now?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some evaluations explicitly analyze the impacts that tools have on energy-related knowledge, attitudes, and behavior, such as DeWaters and Powers (2006) [83] and Karpudewan et al (2015). [86] Other documents describe the impacts of the tools in different periods of time (Hedin and Zapico (2018) [91], Snow et al (2019) [92] and Keller et al (2022) [98]). Several of the works investigate the improvement in energy literacy using different educational programs, of which the research carried out by Bodzin et al stands out (2013) [84], in which a program with a focus on geospatial technologies is compared to the Business as Usual, and that of Rimm-Kaufman et al (2021) [95], with the evaluation of the impacts of a service-based energy learning program, also against a Business as Usual scenario.…”
Section: Improvement Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some evaluations explicitly analyze the impacts that tools have on energy-related knowledge, attitudes, and behavior, such as DeWaters and Powers (2006) [83] and Karpudewan et al (2015). [86] Other documents describe the impacts of the tools in different periods of time (Hedin and Zapico (2018) [91], Snow et al (2019) [92] and Keller et al (2022) [98]). Several of the works investigate the improvement in energy literacy using different educational programs, of which the research carried out by Bodzin et al stands out (2013) [84], in which a program with a focus on geospatial technologies is compared to the Business as Usual, and that of Rimm-Kaufman et al (2021) [95], with the evaluation of the impacts of a service-based energy learning program, also against a Business as Usual scenario.…”
Section: Improvement Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, HCI research has also complemented eco-feedback with concepts such as ecoforecasting (e.g., [27,33,45]) in realizing that an overview of past consumption might not be enough to help people plan and change their behavior. Despite these attempts, HCI studies report that ecofeedback often does not change consumer behavior for reasons such as people already having established practices that do not fit with the intended behavior change [19,50], or technology assuming every user has the knowledge and willingness to act [52].…”
Section: Domestic Energy Consumption In Hcimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those participants felt alienated because these parts of the world were concealed and reduced by Watts. New technology not aligning with existing electricity or heating consuming practices has also been widely regarded as a barrier to sustainable change in HCI (e.g., [19,50,52]). To this end, Kiran [32] argues that practices often conceal alternative behavior.…”
Section: Bridging Dimensions: the Ethical Dimension Of Mediating Dist...mentioning
confidence: 99%